This is gonna be great!
Posted on 01/29/2020 4:08:39 AM PST by Kaslin
Just days before the 2008 Democratic presidential caucuses in Iowa, Hillary Clinton led Barack Obama by four points in the RealClearPolitics average of polls. Obama took the lead, by a few tenths of one percentage point, literally 24 hours before the caucuses. And then he won by nearly eight points.
In retrospect, things were moving very fast in Iowa in those final days before the voting. And now, we are again days away from the Iowa Democratic caucuses. Things might be moving in ways we don't know.
Four candidates have held the lead at various times in the Iowa race. Joe Biden led from the start until the third week in September last year. Then Elizabeth Warren took over and led until mid-November. Then it was Pete Buttigieg's turn; he led until the first week in January.
The new year brought new volatility. First Bernie Sanders led until mid-January. Then Biden led again until Jan. 24. And since then, Sanders has jumped back into the lead.
In the last few days, two candidates -- Sanders and Biden -- seem to be headed up, while the other two -- Warren and Buttigieg -- seem to be headed down. In any event, this seems to be an Iowa caucus in which there is great possibility for last-minute shifts in voter choices. So predictions are useless.
What is undeniable is Democratic establishment nervousness about Sanders. The basic worry is that he is so far to the left that the party might end up nominating the only candidate President Donald Trump can beat.
Just look at some headlines from the last few days:
-- "Dems tormented over how to stop Bernie" (Politico)
-- "'Oh my God, Sanders can win': Democrats grapple with Bernie surge in Iowa" (NBC News)
-- "Worried Democratic operatives scramble to fund a network to take down Bernie Sanders" (Daily Beast)
-- "Fear of Sanders win growing among Democratic establishment" (Associated Press)
-- "'Stop Sanders' Democrats are agonizing over his momentum" (The New York Times)
Actually, that last headline, from the Times, was from April 2019. Democrats were agonizing then, and they're still agonizing now.
It is hard to imagine two more different men than Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump, but establishment Democrats fear that something could be happening in their party that echoes the events of 2016 for Republicans: A candidate with popular appeal who is dismissed by party leaders yet manages to build so much support that the establishment cannot deny him the nomination.
It might seem a little odd that Democrats are so worried by a Trump 2016 scenario. After all, Trump won. But it was, of course, a rocky road, and more than a little unpleasant for GOP bigwigs.
So now Democrats listen when the loser of that race, Hillary Clinton, expresses her apparently undying disdain for Sanders. In an admiring -- aren't they all? -- new documentary on her losing campaign, Clinton says of Sanders: "He was in Congress for years. He had one senator support him. Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done. He was a career politician. It's all just baloney, and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it."
In a promotional interview, the Hollywood Reporter asked Clinton if that assessment still holds. "Yes, it does," she answered.
The only problem for establishment figures like Clinton is that Sanders is leading in Iowa. He is leading in New Hampshire. He is in second place in South Carolina. And then, looking down the road a bit, he is leading in the biggest state of all, California.
The establishment has reason to be worried.
Of course Sanders is far to the left. But there is no doubt the entire Democratic party has moved in his direction in the last four years. There's no indication that movement will stop. The party has come to Bernie, not the other way around. Party leaders might have to come to Bernie, too.
One irrefutable argument the party establishment would have against Sanders is that he is simply too old to be president. He will be 79 years old on Inauguration Day 2021 and will turn 80 that same year. That is unprecedented in American history. And, of course, Sanders suffered a heart attack last October.
Trump, the nation's oldest president ever, could serve four more years, and at the end of two full terms still be younger than Sanders would be on the first day of his presidency.
All that would be an effective argument, except that the establishment's preferred candidate, by the same measure, is also too old to be president. Biden will be 78 on Inauguration Day, and to some observers' eyes looks less energetic and resilient than Sanders.
So, at the moment, the Democratic establishment has no good strategy for dealing with its Sanders problem. In a week, the Iowa caucuses will be over, and the problem could be much, much worse.
Democrap 2020 POTUS candidates are all “ZEROs” from A-Z!!! At the last minute the Democrap will be forced to drag out two time POTUS loser Hillary Rotten Clinton and put out front as their chosen deadbeat, wannabe, loser. Trump will slaughter her politically!!!
They could also go with Michelle Obama, but...I believe the Obama’s are hiding in their 15 million dollar fenced in mansion and the last thing failed ex-POTUS Barack “Magic Wand” Hussein Obama wants id public appearance...loser, america hater & USA traitor/turncoat that he is!!!
Dinna fash, Dems. Buy Bernie another vacation home and he’ll happily go away.
Again.
Capitalism or socialism?
Do we want America to be great? Or do we want America to be Venezuela, and eat our pets and zoo animals?
Democrats hate the Democrat party.
Maybe Obama will send busloads in from Illinois again, like he did in 2008...
Not a compliment but Bernie is (mostly) clear about his insane plans.
Yes, plenty of idiots think socialism in the land of plenty is a good idea but their first priority is a bit of clarity.
They aren’t getting that from the cold oatmeal Democrats. They won’t get that from the cold oatmeal Democrats.
The Hillary position of taking no position has been proven a loser already.
I’m not buying into this argument that the Dems don’t want Bernie as the candidate. He’s not any kind of threat to the Rat hierarchy, so what is this about? This idea that Rats are afraid of Bernie seems contrived.
Talking about Bernie takes the heat of Biden during impeachment. Unbelievably, Biden is still in good shape. Especially if he can win Iowa. Bernie winning in NH really isn’t a big deal given he is from VT.
The democrats know that none of these losers can touch Trump. The concern is which nominee will do the best job of getting rat voters to the polls so they can vote for down ballot candidates. For the Dems this is all about retaking the senate. They, more than likely, will steal the house again but desperately need to be strong enough to steal the senate. The number one leftist priority is stopping Trump from completely taking the judiciary from them for a generation.
The Democrat Establishment is about to figure out what the GOP Establishment learned in 2016.
You can have complete control to implement your policy preferences as you like. Or you can have voters. You can’t have both.
Bernie is a threat inasmuch as by the standards of the Left he is relatively honest. When he says he wants to implement socialism, he MEANS it.
The rest of them for the most part mouth platitudes about goodies for the masses, but behind the curtain they are milking Wall Street and the business community for every red cent they can get.
If Bernie wins the nomination those parties will freak and the money spigots will be slammed shut. THAT is what they fear.
I like your answer.
Speaking of Iowa, I recall in 2004 how Howard Dean was all the rage and had a huge lead. Then he “unexpectedly” got crushed by John Kerry and John Edwards (leading to his “Yeeeaaaaah!” moment). Is this a repeat of 2004? I never understood how the polls and media got it so wrong. Or did they know all along, but wanted to keep the excitement building?
I think you’re right at least when it comes to priorities. For that reason they are probably ok with Bernie winning because his presence will hurt us on the down ballot. The GOP did nothing about the cheating in 18 and that was only the test run. The Senate is the main target unless a game changing rat candidate emerges.
I'm cheering for Sanders, it makes sense that the Democrats should pick their worst candidate.
The media has done a pretty good job at covering Biden’s corruption problem, and also his other problem- he’s beginning to sound feeble. They can cover his ethical problem from the voters for a long time, but if he gets the nomination, a lot of people are going to be shocked at how much he has aged since he was Vice-President.
Does Byron York really think that all of the other candidates, other than Bernie Sanders, would beat Trump if nominated? Pocahontas? Mayor Pete? Deval Patrick? Amy Klobuchar? Tulsi Gabbard? Michael Bennet? Tom Steyer? Michael Bloomberg?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.