Now This is really interesting-— Why would Roberts block a question that “purports” to name a whistleblower— when he has NO PROOF that this individual IS the so called whistleblower?
Even if it IS the whistleblower, there is NO PART of the Statute, which Roberts well knows, that requires the anonymity of the whistleblower. The Statute only protects the employee from vindictive revenge acts and career harm from the Employer, in this case the NSC and cee eye ehhhhhh.
So, WHY is it that Roberts thinks that he should not read out the name of the “whistleblower” UNLESS he is PART of this continuing coup, including his purposeful running of the FISA court, accepting false evidence for the Court. He must be part of the coup.
And why are two low level staffers, who are at the heart of this impeachment effort, allowed to remain anonymous, unseen, and are to be believed absolutely?