There aren't any clear Senate Impeachment Questions Rules. My point was that whatever Roberts is enforcing is not a LAW.
There are vague senate rules on decorum, deliberate revelation of protected information. I'd look to the entire body of senate rules, Riddick's and elsewhere to see exactly what is written on the subject.
Exactly. So Roberts REFUSAL to read Paul’s questions are entirely ARBITRARY. No basis in known law or established rules.
Yet, once again Roberts chooses to protect the Dems from uncomfortable questions by the Republicans. Just as he protected ObamaCare twice from legit legal challenges by rewriting and re-interpreting.
Neither of which is within the purview of the courts.
All of this is FACT yet you choose to excuse and defend his actions. Why?