Guess the NYT dumbos have not yet read NASA’s latest output concerning a possible global cooling due to ...wait....THE SUN.
Those of us who are STEM types have know about this for some time now, but then again, journalists - you know.
So according to the NYTs it would be better for people to die of exposure and starve to death rather than face the mythical globull warming, right?
I have a solution:
Since the greenies over there want no nukes, and no coal plants (to save the environment, of course), chain all the environmentalists to bicycles for pedal power. Note that it may get a little harder to pedal during peak period. Load up on carbs before the morning rush.
The NYT and other Fake News outlets will never, never, NEVER be talked out of their Gorebull Warming Cult beliefs, even when it starts snowing in Miami.
For your interest.
There are no climate risks. Coal can be burned more cleanly than ever.
Coal is good! Wish we had built that plant a few years ago and that the Greenies didn’t stop it. Yucca Mountain was going to be a big fat cow the entire country could have used. They ruined that too.
My God the slimes is an international joke.
these dying msm outlets should put out an add that says..
LOOK AT ME!!! LOVE ME!!! I’M STILL RELEVANT!! I MATTER!! I KNOW WHAT’S BEST FOR YOU!! TRUST ME!!
GET BACK TO WORK ON THE PLANTATION WHERE YOU BELONG YOU FILTHY STINKING PEASANTS!! HAVEN’T YOU EVER HEARD OF THE CASTE SYSTEM!!
We have a sale to get the online edition every day at our website. Check it out.
thank you
They don’t care about other countries, but they want us to be thrown back into the stone age.
How is China doing with putting out their coal seam fires [a significant source of CO2 (and likely CO)]?
"They are monstrous, centuries-old infernos that issue thick billows of ash and smoke, and generate sinkholes that consume roads and homes without warning. Yet in spite of the dangers they pose, underground coal fires are some of the least known environmental disasters. China, the worlds largest miner and consumer of coal, has consistently downplayed the fires in its coalfields, considered the most severe on earth."
https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/6296-The-world-s-longest-burning-fires-China-s-unseen-story
the japanese earthquake causing the nuclear plant disaster probably plays a major role in this decision...
Meanwhile, the idiots in Germany are shutting down some of the cleanest-burning coal plants yet designed. Maybe the Japanese can just buy all the equipment, disassemble it, and ship it home to be reassembled where needed.
Considering we’re going into a cooling period this will not affect us in terms of global warming, in the slightest.
L8r
In before the first “how dare you!”.
***one of the dirtiest sources of electricity***
Electrostatic precipitators removes the fly ash. Other addons take care of other pollutants. So what is there to complain about?
It wasn’t really a Fukushima nuclear disaster that occurred, it was an Environmentalist Win.
The environmentalists won their court cases when the siting for the nuclear plant was established.
Scientists wanted the plant to be located on higher ground to avoid the possibility of a tsunami disaster.
The environmentalists won, so it got built on the level where tsunamis could take it out.
They got their way.
Because, Ms. Kanno, you and other Japanese Luddites demanded the country phase out nuclear energy after the Fukushima tsunami disaster. So, Japan has to rely on fossil fuels now.
Do liberals ever think things through?
CO2 is not a pollutant, despite what 7 dopes on the Supreme Court might say. CO2 is an airborne fertilizer.
The usual leftists are doing their usual fear-mongering.