Biden’s weakness is the story. He was the presumed electable candidate and I believe his poor performance will also be reflected in NV and SC which will be the end for him.
Also, Warren was once perceived as another very strong competitive candidate - the results say otherwise.
The Amy resurgence story I believe is short lived. Buttguy will not garner the same support as Bernie moving forward as he basically doesn’t answer questions and stands on nothing, not a good platform.
So that leaves Bernie and the currently unknown potential of mini-Mike. I don’t think buying ads will win elections, you need to be a retail likable interesting personality, kinda like Perot as quirky as he was.
So in the end, it’s either Sanders or it is not, and with his following the later is as problematic as the former.
“The Amy resurgence story I believe is short lived”
her resurgence is still just a weak number three so far ... i suspect she may now be seen as the “safe” choice compared to the rest of the lunatic kommie gang and other assorted misfits being offered ... it’s eventually possible she rises to number two in the committed delegate count if peteyboi is rejected in the South on super-tuesday, BUT billionaire bloomy might manage to vacuum up the “safe” votes instead ... i guess we’ll just have to wait and see ...
“and the currently unknown potential of mini-Mike. I don’t think buying ads will win elections, you need to be a retail likable interesting personality, kinda like Perot as quirky as he was.”
yeah, i don’t think that’s going to necessarily work either, but it might bring enough name recognition to complete with Klobuchar for the “safe” vote ...
while Klobuchar isn’t particularly interesting personality-wise, she isn’t unlikable either, while Perot, uh, i mean mini-mike seems particularly unrelatable in public; in fact, mini-mike looks distinctly uncomfortable when attempting to mingle with we hoi-polloi, like we regular people are akin to Martians or something ...