Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockingham

On appeal a lawyer could bring up that Trump’s rhetoric inflamed the Judge who then went overboard and gave the maximum sentence. Had it not been for the inflammatory comments the client might have received a lesser sentence.

His comments now become part of the case..and next time...you might not want the person to get out of their sentence.


76 posted on 02/12/2020 8:41:59 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

Judges are supposed to be immune to the influence of even inflammatory comments by a President. If not, the judge should recuse herself from the case — or be removed by the Court of Appeals. In any event, as President, Trump is the federal government’s chief executive and may criticize subordinate officials and give them direction as he thinks best. There is no law against a President doing what Trump said and did.


88 posted on 02/12/2020 9:22:56 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
On appeal a lawyer could bring up that Trump’s rhetoric inflamed the Judge who then went overboard and gave the maximum sentence.

What the hell are you talking about? If it could be said that Trump (an outside interest) influenced a judge to through the book at Stone, that is solid grounds to throw the sentence out and start over. That would be in Stone's interest, AKA a good thing.
90 posted on 02/12/2020 9:33:57 PM PST by JoSixChip (I'm an American Nationalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson