Posted on 02/19/2020 6:45:17 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
NEW YORK - As Republican President Donald Trump seeks a second term in November, Americans interest in voting is growing faster in large cities dominated by Democrats than in conservative rural areas, according to an analysis of Reuters/Ipsos national opinion polls.
If the trend lasts until Election Day on Nov. 3, it would be a reversal from the 2016 election when rural turnout outpaced voting in urban areas, helping Trump narrowly win the White House.
The finding, based on responses from more than 88,000 U.S. adults who took the online poll from August to December 2015 or from August to December 2019, suggests that the Blue Wave, a swell of anti-Trump activism that followed his entry into the White House in 2017, is still rolling across the countrys largest population centers.
Even as Trump commands rock-solid support among Republicans, voters interest in going to the polls appears to be growing faster among those who disapprove of Trump than among those who approve of him, according to experts who reviewed the data.
The advantage in urban political engagement extends deep into the most competitive battleground states that Trump won by razor-thin margins four years ago, the data shows.
In large urban areas of the upper Midwest, a region that includes swing states Michigan and Wisconsin, for example, the number of people who said they were certain to vote in the upcoming presidential election rose by 10 percentage points to 67% compared with survey responses from 2015.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Polls said Hillary would be president too.
Al Reuters..favorite “news” outlet of Swamp Creatures everywhere.
Had me worried until I got to this point:
“The Reuters/Ipsos poll, which is conducted online and administered throughout the United States, started asking American adults in 2012 to rate their overall level of interest in voting in upcoming general elections.
“Poll respondents were asked to rate their level of engagement on a scale of one to 10, with one meaning they were certain not to vote and 10 meaning they were certain to participate.
It gathered 53,394 responses in the last five months of 2015 and 35,271 responses in the same part of 2019.”
SOSDE........................
and in other news: Hillary has a 96 percent chance of winning and Trump has a 3 percent chance.
More psychological warfare.
I suggest treating this info as very possible, even though it’s probably propaganda-—as evidenced by early primary turnouts.
If the rats had a real candidate, I might give this report some credence.
But the Democrat presidential race is a dumpster fire this year. Nobody’s excited about it, even the pundits on the Left.
Yet somehow a “great blue wave” is rising out of the cities, 9 months prior to the election. Right...
So what? Democrats are desperate so theyre claiming the big cities will turn out for them in bigger numbers than in 2016.
Now theyre focusing their hope on increased turnout when they have no one who can beat Trump and they dont have a positive agenda.
About that? Theres the old saw you cant beat something with nothing and thats true in 2020.
Polls are designed and intended to Shape Opinion, Not reflect it.
We can expect to see more of these garbage polls as the calendar marches on to November. The Leftist propagandists are going to fire every weapon they have in their quest for power. Think it’s been bad over the last three years? We ain’t seen nothing yet.
I got to start looking at where the article is coming from before I waste my time reading them. It’s really the order you need to do things on here
Wow! This undeniable phenomenon will probably result in the Democrats winning New York and California by pretty wide margins! Shocking.
“interest in voting”
Just how the hell are you supposed to quantify THAT?
Tells me 2 things.
1) Trump voters refuse to talk to pollsters
2) Interest won’t actually get this slugs off the couch on Election Day.
But, but, but we won the popular vote by 400 million!
I’m assuming these polls are as accurate as 2016, in which they were trying to be persuasive rather than predictive.
If they say it..they believe it is true...it is not true.
So Democrats will get more voters out in NY and LA where they have a vote surplus - we dont hold a national election for the President but state by state.
2018 turnout for the Democrats really was huge. They flipped 40 house seats, mostly in moderate, suburban districts where Trump was not popular.
Reuters/Ipsos. Of course. And who did they predict won in 2016?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.