Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

Please note the article says that he wanted actual information, not a made up story. There is nothing wrong with that. Whether or not it’s wrong to say he would then work to get Assange a pardon is another question, but he certainly had the right to say it in a conversation.


18 posted on 02/20/2020 8:30:18 AM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Williams
Whether or not it’s wrong to say he would then work to get Assange a pardon is another question, but he certainly had the right to say it in a conversation.

If you are promising presidential action on something then shouldn't you check with the President before you promise it?

24 posted on 02/20/2020 8:34:48 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Williams
Please note the article says that he wanted actual information, not a made up story. There is nothing wrong with that. Whether or not it’s wrong to say he would then work to get Assange a pardon is another question, but he certainly had the right to say it in a conversation.

Agree.

Essentially Rohrabacher went to Assange and asked if he had proof Russia didn't hack the DNC. It's difficult to prove the negative but he was also asking 'do you have any evidence someone else did it?' And if you do have evidence it was someone else than the Russians the evidence would benefit Assange and Trump.

Simply asking someone if they had evidence to prove your client innocent isn't a crime.

If Rohrabacher asked Assange to fabricate proof it wasn't the Russians that would be different.

31 posted on 02/20/2020 8:45:20 AM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson