Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: struggle

I thought they withdrew the 7-9 year recommendation. Did they change it to 3 1/2 or did the judge just pull that number out of her butt?


62 posted on 02/20/2020 9:53:35 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

They didn’t’ actually give a number in the revised memo, just significantly less than 7-9.


80 posted on 02/20/2020 9:57:46 AM PST by ronbivtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

Judge-butt

The new DOJ prosecutor ignored Barr and went for the 7-9 too


86 posted on 02/20/2020 9:59:09 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

The attorneys fled. She pulled the number out...Total discretionary


87 posted on 02/20/2020 9:59:13 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

I thought they withdrew the 7-9 year recommendation. Did they change it to 3 1/2 or did the judge just pull that number out of her butt?


That’s basically what the guideline calculations say, without the gaming of the calculations to include ‘threatening a witness’. 36-46 months.

It’s still way more than typical, especially given that proving he was lying meant he didn’t do the thing that was being investigated.


176 posted on 02/20/2020 10:51:20 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson