[RomanSoldier19]

Yes it Guardian, all that heat my stop that coronavirus

[ClearCase_guy]

If we do this, we are “war-mongers”.
If we don’t do this, we are “unprepared”.

If we talk about this, we are “saber-rattling”.
If we don’t talk about this, we are “keeping secrets”.

[Sacajaweau]

We’re really briefing reporters now on military defense practices?

[moovova]

“Shall we play a game?”

[I want the USA back]

If it was a war game, then there was no war with Russia. It was an exercise, which the military does all the time. The guardian is full of a$$wholes.

[KarlInOhio]

Well, boys, I reckon this is it. New-q-lure combat, toe-to-toe with the Rooskies. ... Heck, I reckon you wouldn't even be human beins if you didn't have some pretty strong personal feelings about nuclear combat.

[sanjuanbob]

Who won?

[McGruff]

...a senior Pentagon official has confirmed...is notable because of the defence department’s highly unusual decision to brief journalists about the details...

A leak becomes a briefing?

[BenLurkin]

.
.

[Vermont Lt]

My SIL was in in that. He told me that his single unit won the war and he was going to get an imaginary bronze star.

I told him I used to play guns as a kid. I shot a bunch of Indians.

[indthkr]

I'm sure they do this multiple times a month in a variety of scenarios, or at least I hope so!

[Flick Lives]

The war game is notable because of the defence department’s highly unusual decision to brief journalists about the details

- -

One has to ask why DOD needed to drop the details on this simulation. They have an angle they’re playing and it’s anti-Trump.

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

Delivering a “message” without the nuclear dust fallout, for now.

Our message to Vlad is, this is our version of “Putting on the Blitz” (aka “Putin is blitzed”).

[Chode]