Of course, she didn’t only tweet about Trump, she celebrated Stone’s arrest. So... that seems to me like bias. And if she denied it at the time (and seems to still deny it) is there a case for perjury? Disbarment, since she is an attorney?
From the linked article: She said in a written questionnaire at the time that she did not remember ever posting about Stone or any other figures involved in the case. “I was zeroed in about Roger Stone in responding to that question, but I still didn’t remember,” she said Tuesday.
What is the evidence that the juror "celebrated" Stone's arrest? What is it that the juror "still didn't remember" during the original questioning?
The linked article is shamefully ambiguous and if done intentionally constitutes "fake news".
Although I haven't followed Stone's case, I have read that he was supposedly convicted of "helping cover up for Trump", whatever that is supposed to mean. That would seem to mean that Trump qualifies as "a figure involved in the case". Did the Judge exclude jurors who posted negative opinions about Trump or didn't she? That seems to be a key question?
What am I missing here?
In DC street language, Hart is known as “BBL” - black bitch lying. Jackson is now known as “WBL” - white bitch lying.
Seems to be a common illness among Democrat women.