The 1938 NFA paved the way for GCA 1968. The Miller case was set up to short circuit Constitutional challenges of the NFA.
1 posted on
02/29/2020 3:49:56 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
When communist/progressives/liberals want power they lie all the time.
2 posted on
02/29/2020 4:25:37 AM PST by
riverrunner
( o the public,)
To: marktwain
One small nit: It is the Federal Firearms Act of 1938.
4 posted on
02/29/2020 5:44:32 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: marktwain
From the Miller decision:
Considering Sonzinsky v. United States (1937), 300 U. S. 506, 300 U. S. 513, and what was ruled in sundry causes arising under the Harrison Narcotic Act [Footnote 2] -- United States v. Jin Fuey Moy (1916), 241 U. S. 394, United States v. Doremus (1919), 249 U. S. 86, 249 U. S. 94; Linder v. United States (1925), 268 U. S. 5; Alston v. United States (1927), 274 U. S. 289; Nigro v. United States (1928), 276 U. S. 332 -- the objection that the Act usurps police power reserved to the States is plainly untenable.
The Harrison Narcotic Act precedents foreclosed the possibility of a ruling that a regulation disguised as a tax was a constitutional problem, something Justice Roberts reaffirmed in the Obamacare case.
It wasn't the last time that gun grabbers followed the legal trails blazed by drug warriors. Gonzalez v Raich led directly and immediately to the ruling in US v Stewart that a homegrown machine gun for personal use is covered under the commerce clause.
To: marktwain
7 posted on
02/29/2020 7:12:22 AM PST by
TBP
(Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson