These scientists need to go to their Safe Place.
The Chinese are going to kick our collective asses if this is what passes for science in Western civilization today.
These people are clinically insane.
1. The Guardian
2. Duggan, a science communicator at Australian National University
Meh, time to shine my light bulbs.
“Climate Crisis”
I don’t know about the rest of you guys, but I am OVER this phony as- BS.
Next person that even tries to talk to me about “Climate Crisis” is probably going to get a kick to the penis, and then I’ll cough on them.
I have had enough of phony people and their lies.
Then there is the eco statement and commitment by ‘the guardian:
We will continue our longstanding record of powerful environmental reporting, which is known around the world for its quality and independence. In April 2019, the Columbia Journalism Review said, ‘For some time now, by far the best daily reporting on climate change has come from the Guardian, which covers the science, politics, economics, and health aspects throughout the world with great force and clarity.’ We will prioritise and give prominence to environmental journalism from The Guardian and Observer, bringing you the news and information you need. Our reporting on the environment, from our international team, will never be influenced by commercial or political interests and will always be rooted in scientific fact.
We will report on how environmental collapse is already affecting people around the world, including during natural disasters and extreme weather events. We will bring you the worlds leading voices on the climate crisis, and we will cover issues across food, travel and lifestyle in order to help readers live sustainably. We will undertake investigations into the economic and political structures that underpin the carbon economy, and examine the role the climate crisis plays in many other critical issues - including inequality, migration and the battle over scarce resources.
We will use language that recognises the severity of the crisis were in. In May 2019, the Guardian updated its style guide to introduce terms that more accurately describe the environmental crises facing the world, using climate emergency, crisis or breakdown and global heating instead of climate change and global warming. We want to ensure that we are being scientifically precise, while also communicating clearly with readers on the urgency of this issue.
The Guardian will achieve net zero emissions by 2030. We are developing a detailed plan for how to achieve this, involving a full audit of our emissions. Our priority will be to reduce our carbon footprint meaningfully and permanently.
We will be transparent with our progress. We have announced today that we have become the first news organisation to acquire BCorp certification, which means joining a community of businesses from across the globe who openly commit to driving positive societal change. This is an important milestone in public transparency and accountability for our global environmental footprint.
We will no longer accept advertising from fossil fuel extractive companies on any of the Guardians websites and apps, nor in the Guardian, Observer and Guardian Weekly in print. This includes any business primarily involved in extracting fossil fuels, including many of the worlds largest polluters. Our decision is based on the decades-long efforts by many in the industry to prevent meaningful climate action by governments around the world.
Environmental journalism from the Guardian and the Observer has a powerful impact around the world and we have received financial support from readers in more than 180 countries. This support means we can keep Guardian journalism accessible to everyone. We hope you will consider supporting Guardian journalism today with a contribution or subscription every form of support, however big or small, is so valuable for our future.
If you really care, any equipment you are using that has any relation to petroleum products must be disposed of. Come on, do it. And, just how is you crap spread anyway? Solar power? Wind power? Hemp fired generators?
Give the whiner Coronavirus.
Then let him think on that for awhile instead.
Ping.
It makes me feel sad. And it scares me,
...it would be truly aggravating to have to spend 5 minutes with an idiot like this.
I wonder how the ‘scared, sad’ scientist would feel if his ‘climate change’ brethren actually got what they wanted.
Living in yurts, or maybe mud huts.
Eating nothing but vegetables, or perhaps grass.
Walking everywhere. No ‘evil’ gas-powered vehicles (except for the elites, of course)
No electricity, so what would the scientist do, and how would he conduct research with no modern conveniences?
Would he rather enjoy living as a slave to his betters, telling him what to do over every aspect of his life?
Since he’s male and is likely white, the true climate changers would likely instead just want him dead. The only way he’d hit the trifecta of the death-mark is to be an American.
Pofoundly stupid and feel silly.
I wonder how he ‘feels’ his way thru scientific experiments ...
“scientists reveal personal fears about the climate crisis”
They are internalizing their own propagandist hog wash?
The day the warming movers and shakers start pushing for next generation nuclear power is the day I start getting genuinely concerned, until then - not in the least
All these “scientists” should kill themselves already OR go to China, India, Pakistan, and every other of the MAJOR polluters in the world.
The US has the cleanest air and water we have had in a generation. Our country is a good steward of the earth.
Leave us alone and work with the real polluters, #NOCASHFROMUS
The extremists, of course, offer wind and solar as a solution. They are perfectly willing to carpet all of flyover country with wind turbines that they themselves would refuse to allow in their own viewsheds. And they are perfectly happy to triple or quadruple the cost of electricity, tank the economy, and let the peasants revert to a much lower standard of living. To the extremists, this is a feature, not a bug.
The environmental left would be opposed to pixie dust if pixie dust were cheap enough to support mass prosperity and rising standards of living.
If only we would have sent $trillions of dollars to other countries, we would all be safe!
I tend to ask these morons if they agree that pollution is the main cause of ‘climate change’.
They usually say yes.
Then I ask if they would agree that stopping pollution is the main thing we need to do to stop the ‘climate crisis’.
They usually say yes.
So then I tell them OK we agree 100% on that. Stopping pollution is good.
So then I ask if they would rather stop pollution, or send trillions of dollars overseas? Because that’s ALL the ‘Paris Accord’ did.
It did NOTHING to specifically stop pollution, it just asked what they planned to do - and most countries planned to keep doing what they were already doing- which was little or nothing.
All it did was collect $trillions of dollars to form some new ‘climate’ organization, that would have had power to tell every country what to do... It was a giant step toward One World Government.
SOME OF THEM are smart enough to ‘get it’ at that point.
That pretty much describes the whole global warming hoax.