Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shethink13
"If there is no large population that has had the virus without symptoms, then the infection rate is very low and not quite as dangerous."

Again....THERE IS NO DATA...NONE...to support this notion.

"As I've said before, the test has already been approved by the FDA. The testing method is one that has been used for years for detection of other viral antibodies. It can't be any worse than the rushed, cumbersome PCR testing for the virus itself.

No. PCR is FAR more selective and sensitive...cumbersome, yes. I have direct experience with PCR and immunoassay tests from developing biowarfare detection technology.

"Then go sit in your basement with your toilet paper and let the rest of us get back to living.

Thus assuring a resurgence of the virus, and more people dead. And demonstrating the true selfishness behind this whole idea.

34 posted on 04/09/2020 4:00:16 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
Thus assuring a resurgence of the virus, and more people dead. And demonstrating the true selfishness behind this whole idea.

Assure a resurgence? There's no data to support that either yet you claim it as fact. There is only modeling which is constantly being changed with a "oh, sorry, my bad".

Selfish is making everybody sit in their basement because you're paranoid.

Grow up, worry about YOUR OWN HEALTH and I'll take care of mine.

35 posted on 04/09/2020 9:55:03 AM PDT by Shethink13 (there are 0 electoral votes in the state of denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson