Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ransomed

Is the mandatory reporting requirement for lost/stolen guns only enforceable for those guns originally purchased from a ffl holder after the expanded background check law comes into effect? I don’t see how it could be enforceable with guns purchased before the expanded background check law, but I’m no expert for sure.
= = =

It’s just a way to make us criminals.

So some gun is used in a crime, or turns up somewhere.

Tracing, interviews with family or friends or enemies, investigative work, etc., points it back to you.

If so, guess what. You did not report it. Now you are a criminal, and no guns for you.


17 posted on 04/13/2020 8:09:24 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Scrambler Bob

Well, I think they use the serial number of the gun to find the ffl holder where it was originally sold/transferred from. Then they contact the ffl holder and get them to look up the name of that buyer from their records. But before expanded background checks you could have walked out the door and sold it to a stranger 5 minutes later, or tell them that you did anyhow. Like I said I’m definitely no expert on this.

So I’m thinking it can’t be enforceable for guns originally sold/transferred before expanded background checks. Because they don’t know if you actually still have those guns or not.

Freegards


18 posted on 04/13/2020 8:58:56 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson