To: Flick Lives
When the media pivots like this all at the same time I get very suspicious.
I have said all along it came from that lab. The only question is was it man made and was it released with intention.
12 posted on
04/15/2020 4:44:29 PM PDT by
RummyChick
( Yeah, it's Daily Mail. So what.)
To: RummyChick
I have said all along it came from that lab. The only question is was it man made and was it released with intention. Good question!
To: RummyChick
“...The only question is was it man made and was it released with intention....”
There is one other question: Who were their U.S. collaborators on the release? Their names need to be made public knowledge.
109 posted on
04/15/2020 9:54:09 PM PDT by
lgjhn23
(Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
To: RummyChick
That's exactly the point. The evidence that it came from the lab is mounting -- but that doesn't mean that it was intentionally released, it could have, but mere incompetence is also possible. Then the other question: what were they doing with the virus in that lab? There's no such thing as purely civilian uses in China, everything is an extension of the state. It's entirely possible that they were combining legitimate research, but keeping an eye open for a future biological agent that could be used as a weapon. It doesn't need to have been engineered to be considered for use as a weapon, in fact if you look at it the right way, anything can be a weapon. It just depends on how you put it to use.
152 posted on
04/17/2020 5:17:44 PM PDT by
absalom01
(You should do your dut!!y in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson