Posted on 04/19/2020 6:32:32 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The World Health Organization (WHO) is claiming that there is no evidence that natural antibodies can protect individuals from coronavirus, setting the stage for a widespread vaccination push as the only solution to the pandemic.
WHO leaders are telling governments across the world not to rely on tests that indicate whether or not an individual has contracted coronavirus at some point because they believe theses people could be reinfected even after they had the virus previously.
Nobody is sure whether someone with antibodies is fully protected against having the disease or being exposed again, said Mike Ryan, the executive director of WHOs emergencies program.
Over three million serology tests have been purchased by the British government to measure antibodies in blood plasma, but WHO leaders are casting serious doubt on this strategy to contain the coronavirus pandemic. These sort of tests are similar to blood-prick tests that have been widely used to instantly determine if a person has HIV.
The WHO is making this determination after Silvio Brusaferro, the health institute chief in Italy, reported that only ten percent of Italians have developed immunity, according to his research. This is expected to put a death blow to an immunity passport plan that has been championed by the likes of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Although that Orwellian scheme has seemingly been defeated, WHO will be using the pandemic to push vaccines as the only way to ensure that the pandemic is eradicated. They are coordinating scientists and researchers on a frenzied push to develop a vaccine that can be synthesized and distributed across the world.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...
What evidence is there that a vaccine will work?
WHO first
Bill Gates.
Soros.
The Fauch.
It’s all about the Vax for the Masses.
So no antibiotics can stop it but a vaccine can? How does that work...that’s plain stupid!!! What is it a magic bullet? I smell BS!!
I smell Adam Schiff
My thoughts exactly. Any intelligent person would think the same thing. Too bad there are so many people who won’t see the contradiction.
Who has an agenda other than health and well being. And this just proves it.
No matter what one believes, disbelieves, hears or reads...never, ever pay attention to the WHO.
No way! Why, it’s as if ... it’s as if ... the WHO has a vaccine agenda. I never would have thought that in a million years. I mean, there was so much media support for HQL.
Soros, they want to drive the remaining nails in our coffin
No evidence it won’t.
Shouldn’t the highly funded WHO know by now?
Look at the globalist garbage that runs WHO.
Let Colbert and the rest of the Hollywood scumbags get the gates shot. I trust the WHO about as much as trust a Clinton.
What are vaccines?????????
But antibodies dont prevent reinfection? Lol
The WHO says there is no evidence that....
Listening to those incompetent, China-servicing corrupticrats is what got us in this trouble in the first place.
Yeah, nothing to see here folks, just keep going along with the narrative...
Golly mister! The only two things missing are a vaccine, and proof that natural antibodies don't work.Bring Out Your Dead
Post to me or FReep mail to be on/off the Bring Out Your Dead ping list.
The purpose of the Bring Out Your Dead ping list (formerly the Ebola ping list) is very early warning of emerging pandemics, as such it has a high false positive rate.
The false positive rate was 100%.
At some point we may well have a high mortality pandemic, and likely as not the Bring Out Your Dead threads will miss the beginning entirely.
*sigh* Such is life, and death...
If a quarantine saves just one child's or one old farts life, it's worth it.
There is No Evidence WHO has a clue or would tell the truth if it did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.