1 posted on
04/20/2020 8:25:21 AM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
“Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Elena Kagan dissented from the decision.”
Interesting split, conservatives and liberals on both sides of the decision.
.Support Free Republic Folks, Donate Today!
Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a new monthly donor!
9 posted on
04/20/2020 8:42:16 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: jazusamo
If you’re innocent get a Judge, if you’re Guilty get a Jury.
10 posted on
04/20/2020 8:44:47 AM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
To: jazusamo
A 10 - 2 verdict is not without a reasonable doubt.
11 posted on
04/20/2020 8:45:06 AM PDT by
immadashell
(Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
To: jazusamo
So, do all supreme court rulings have to be 100% ? / s
To: Salvation
Looks like an Oregon PING...
17 posted on
04/20/2020 9:03:46 AM PDT by
Rio
To: jazusamo
So much for the democrats agenda of re-writhing the Constitution
22 posted on
04/20/2020 9:29:10 AM PDT by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
To: jazusamo
An impartial jury is almost impossible to seat these days, unless the defendant’s political leanings are totally hidden from the jury pool.
24 posted on
04/20/2020 9:33:01 AM PDT by
JimRed
(TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: jazusamo
Courts are usually the only protection citizens have against the government. And since courts ARE part of the government, they don’t always do their part. It’s good to see them standing up for the citizen.
29 posted on
04/20/2020 9:37:53 AM PDT by
Fido969
(In!)
To: jazusamo
31 posted on
04/20/2020 9:58:55 AM PDT by
karnage
To: jazusamo
Wonder if unanimous jury decisions were required when the Constitution was written.
36 posted on
04/20/2020 10:30:07 AM PDT by
odawg
To: jazusamo
Unfortunately there’s far too much jury nullification as it is...and this will only make it worse.
46 posted on
04/20/2020 11:21:14 AM PDT by
BobL
To: jazusamo
The case is Ramos v. Lousiana, and the opinion can be read
here. I hate it when the "news" can't even be bothered to mention the case name.
48 posted on
04/20/2020 11:36:56 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
To: jazusamo
Of course SCOTUS does not, nor should they, wade into the deep murky waters of a citizenry that is too stupid and vain to apply the laws of logic in order to convict.
That is the real issue facing us-- brought to you by public education.
To: jazusamo
Our new conservatives proved to be not so conservative once again.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
