Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blood oxygen saturation testing for COVID-19
City Journal ^ | April 26, 2020 | James R. Copland

Posted on 04/26/2020 11:36:42 PM PDT by dpwiener

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Oscar in Batangas

The FDA is ok with lawyers who were elected to be Governors and Mayors practicing medicine, so what’s the deal?


41 posted on 04/27/2020 4:16:42 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox

That’s different.

The govs & mayors ore only functioning as anal sphincters

(Which somehow seems PERFECTLY appropriate!!!)

/sarc /nosarc


42 posted on 04/27/2020 4:20:00 AM PDT by Oscar in Batangas ( (January 20, 2017, High Noon. The end of an error.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener

I’ve been using the Samsung Health app on my S8+ for a couple years, including the O2 saturation. I typically range between 97-99. I’m convinced I had the virus in late January, and my symptoms included shortness of breath. I wasn’t struggling to breath, but I felt like I wasn’t getting enough oxygen. That had me a little concerned so I used the Samsung app to measure my O2 saturation. It dropped throughout the day and bottomed out at 92. That was a first for me. (Covid-19 wasn’t really in the news yet, so I was mainly thinking pneumonia.)

By the 2nd day, my 02 was back up to around 95 (and my fever had dropped below 99). So I knew I was heading in the right direction. It was nice having that app, just to keep an eye on things.

One note: I’ve read that the Samsung S9 isn’t quite as accurate as the S8 in measuring O2%. Not sure about the S10.


43 posted on 04/27/2020 4:38:46 AM PDT by NoLongerTrappedInNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee

I have an app on my iphone that checks O2 levels. Cost 4.99.


44 posted on 04/27/2020 4:49:46 AM PDT by cyberstoic (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Aiden

Accuracy is good, but precision is more important. “If” you make the measurement routinely and it drops significantly, than “you got trouble”. Of course, if you DON’T do regular measurements, THE you need it to be “first reading out of the box” accurate.


45 posted on 04/27/2020 5:06:32 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener

https://www.androidcentral.com/how-measure-oxygen-saturation-using-samsung-health


46 posted on 04/27/2020 5:07:09 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyberstoic

There are several in the App Store. Which one did you get?


47 posted on 04/27/2020 5:21:12 AM PDT by SeaDragon ("Life is tough ..... It's even tougher if you're stupid." - John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Excellent insight!


48 posted on 04/27/2020 5:36:39 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

It’s the advantage of retirement. You finally have a chance to sit down and really think about things.


49 posted on 04/27/2020 5:51:42 AM PDT by wastoute (Anyone who believes PsyOps are not involved has never met a PsyOps Officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I never used those things because I learned as an orderly to use your 5 senses to determine if someone is “sick”. As an orderly I had to do “vital signs” on some 50 patients at least once a shift. I realized pretty early on the standard I was being held to was not “the numbers are OK” but that the “vital signs” were really just an excuse to make the staff actually go in the room and touch the patient. Walking out of the room when someone clearly had a “change in condition”, the “vital signs were OK” was NOT going to be a “defense”. It was a lesson that served me well in the subsequent decades and earned me a reputation with the nurses as “someone they could trust”. Made my life so much easier.


50 posted on 04/27/2020 5:57:28 AM PDT by wastoute (Anyone who believes PsyOps are not involved has never met a PsyOps Officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener

“We’re the government. We’re here to protect you. Do what we say. Don’t question us.”


51 posted on 04/27/2020 6:00:45 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

But my brain only gets 10% of 02. Maybe that is why I can’t think so fast.


52 posted on 04/27/2020 6:03:16 AM PDT by oldasrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

“Why would they block this feature ?”

That was my overriding question. Read the article. It’s a little murky.

For example, there are blood-oxygen-measuring devices on the market, but they have been categorized by the FDA as “wellness” devices rather than “health” devices and FDA doesn’t regulate the former.

From the article:

“The agency [FDA] always faces harsh public and congressional scrutiny over drugs and devices that fail or cause harm.”


53 posted on 04/27/2020 6:14:14 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks

In normal physiology in the resting state a human heart pumps (for the ideal 70 kg. Man) your entire circulating volume each minute. 20% of that goes to the brain. In real life when the O2 per 100 ml of blood falls from the normal state by just 10 or 15% one rapidly suffers a deterioration of consciousness. Which makes that “hands on evaluation” distinct from the “vital signs” so important. JARMOC is the acronym by which to evaluate. Judgement, Affect, Recall, mentation, orientation, and cognition. Turns out the instrument between your ears if FAR more sensitive than any test or “vital sign”.


54 posted on 04/27/2020 6:15:43 AM PDT by wastoute (Anyone who believes PsyOps are not involved has never met a PsyOps Officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

Because leaving that feature available opened them to liability they did not want to deal with.

I had a partner some ten years ago who got burned by a lady with a PE. He seemed convinced that the way he would never get burned again would be to purchase one of these devices. I tried to explain to him the way to not get burned again was realize the PE is a diagnosis made 50% of the time at autopsy and if he REALLY didn’t want to get burned again he just need to “increase his sensitivity” to the subtle presentation of this diagnosis and the terrible consequences of missing it.

I always had a VERY low threshold to R/O PE as it was so prevalent in Neurosurgical Patients. I never got burned. In fact I remember one occasion i saved the ass of a very good ER doctor.


55 posted on 04/27/2020 6:21:37 AM PDT by wastoute (Anyone who believes PsyOps are not involved has never met a PsyOps Officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

In fact that “very good ER doctor” had actually been just a couple years earlier the Chief of Internal Medicine at U of Penn. Where he retired and worked ER to “double dip”. So it happens to THE BEST.


56 posted on 04/27/2020 6:24:54 AM PDT by wastoute (Anyone who believes PsyOps are not involved has never met a PsyOps Officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

I understood that. But, if they had an issue, then it should have been discussed before now. Instead people want to use it, and the FDA in all their power says ‘we don’t think it’s safe at a time when it may be useful.’ Thanks Mom and Dad.


57 posted on 04/27/2020 7:05:44 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

It’s probably because they think we are all bleach /Lysol drinkers.


58 posted on 04/27/2020 7:07:21 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Thank you for being that person. I know additional lives were saved through that alone.

I have a close friend who has been a nurse for a long time. She has told me stories of doctors that you couldn’t consistently trust in those circumstances.


59 posted on 04/27/2020 7:11:49 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

“But, if they had an issue, then it should have been discussed before now.”

Go into the article. I didn’t read it carefully but I think Apple put the blood-oxygen-measuring feature in and then decided to not go through the FDA approval process, so they didn’t tell us it was there.


60 posted on 04/27/2020 8:27:45 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson