[Gay State Conservative]

You could well be correct.Joe DiGenova is firmly convinced that at least a few big names are gonna go on trial.However,I've heard him say...in the same breath...that there's no way that any of them will be convicted by a DC jury.That makes sense given that DC went 90% for ILLary.

But with all that said it must be accepted that regardless of what happens in the coming months regarding this treasonous conspiracy all this nation's gonna hear from now until early November (if not beyond) is:

"TRUMP LIED,PEOPLE DIED"

[lepton]

However,I’ve heard him say...in the same breath...that there’s no way that any of them will be convicted by a DC jury.That makes sense given that DC went 90% for ILLary.

---

The Starr SP investigations tailed off after Clinton-appointed judges began assigning him to sensitive cases, open jury tampering was allowed, and most of all after DC juries began letting people off even where the Administration folks admitted to the crimes in open court.

[GnuThere]

This is the travesty, if people have committed crimes against our country, they should get a jury representative of the country they’ve committed treason against, not a jury from a 90% Rat stronghold.

[hardspunned]

This might be a stupid question, but can Jensen bring charges in Missouri?

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

Why was Kavanaugh asked about military tribunals?