Replies

"That is on its face absurd! The judge is a liberal loon arguing that "equal protection" is the same as "equal treatment." He deliberately conflates them under the 14th amendment! The equal protection clause does not mean equal treatment. There is a big difference between "equal treatment" and "equal protection.""

Expanding on what you said about the 14th Amendment…

That amendment applies to the states only those protections that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect.

In other words, the pro-abortion, institutionally indoctrinated, activist judge is wrongly ignoring that the states have the right to make laws that discriminate on the basis of anything that the states have not amended the Constitution to expressly protect.

And the states have never amended the Constitution to protect the so-called “right” to murder unborn children, a politically correct, Democratic vote-winning “right” legislated from the bench by post-17th Amendment activist justices imo.

If equal protections applied, then otherwise ineligible grade school-indoctrinated students could claim the right to vote, for example, in front of undocumented and deceased Democrats, and family pets.

Send "Orange Man Bad" federal and state government Democrats and RINOs home in November!

Supporting PDJT with a new patriot Congress and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a third term in office imo.

MAGA, also KAGA! (Keep America Great Always!)