Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson
In other words the 302s are not evidence presented by a fact witness. They are hearsay.

Can anyone imagine, that in 2020 when 7 year old kids can use the audio/video record function on their own, personal phone, send it to the cloud for storage, and later review it, that the fbi is still recording interviews via a hand written, memory recollection?

How in the world can this practice be justified?

It has always been open for fraud, but before this, we had some sense of trust for the 99.9% of the hard working, pure as the driven snow, fbi agents, as always pointed out by hannity.

BTW, did you know that hannity came from a cop laden family, and his two uncles were deity, because they were fbi?

The fbi is corrupt. People talk about the "seventh floor".

Who the hell were working on the first six floors, ninja mutants?

15 posted on 05/09/2020 8:51:06 AM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE THE MOOSELIMB, TERRORISTS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: USS Alaska

What do you think a defense lawyer is going to do anytime a 302 is submitted as evidence. “Your Honor, I move to exclude all testimony in the 302 or related to in the 302. It is hearsay.”

Mafia, Cartel, individuals in prison will be first in line.


18 posted on 05/09/2020 9:02:18 AM PDT by NTHockey (My rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: USS Alaska

California Evidence Code is a little bit different than the Federal Rules of Evidence, but this much should be the same: the 302 is admissible,
Not to prove the truth of the matter asserted, Flynn’s innocence, but that the statement asserting innocence was made. That’s all the legal significance that is needed in this case


19 posted on 05/09/2020 9:02:44 AM PDT by j.havenfarm ( Beginning my 20th year on FR! 2,500+ replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: USS Alaska

California Evidence Code is a little bit different than the Federal Rules of Evidence, but this much should be the same: the 302 is admissible,
Not to prove the truth of the matter asserted, Flynn’s innocence, but that the statement asserting innocence was made. That’s all the legal significance that is needed in this case


20 posted on 05/09/2020 9:02:59 AM PDT by j.havenfarm ( Beginning my 20th year on FR! 2,500+ replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: USS Alaska
Can anyone imagine, that in 2020 when 7 year old kids can use the audio/video record function on their own, personal phone, send it to the cloud for storage, and later review it,...

Strzok got dinged in his firing report for using private email for official business. He claimed he didn't know how to use the secure access program on his government issued laptop.

37 posted on 05/10/2020 11:13:39 PM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson