“...he thinks they may get off.”
*******************************
If by “get off” he means found to be NOT GUILTY because it was self defense, he would be right.
Uh, no. Chasing someone down the street with a gun and then shooting him when he resists you isn’t “self defense” by any stretch of the law.
There is no evidence this is self-defense. And quite a bit that it isn’t
There was no self defense. The moron put himself in danger.
It was not self defense
‘If by “get off” he means found to be NOT GUILTY because it was self defense, he would be right.’
he’s right about them being overcharged with murder; but it could be argued that they were committing a crime by chasing this guy down when a citizen’s arrest is unjustified...there is no way they got off on self defense, ridiculous to even bring it up...