"PARDON, SIR. NOT PRESIDENTIAL FINANCES, WE ARE ASKING FOR HIS PERSONAL TAX RETURNS BEFORE HE BECAME PRESIDENT. THOSE ARE VERY DIFFERENT THINGS. AND WE ARE NOT ASKING HIM TO PRODUCE IT. SOME OF THE SUBPOENAS AS FAR BACK AS 1792 HAVE ASKED FOR PERSONAL PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENT WHILE BEING PRESIDENT. THIS IS BEFORE HE WAS PRESIDENT. I DON'T UNDERSTAND. AND THEY ARE NOT HIS PAPERS IN THE SENSE OF HE'S NOT IN POSSESSION OF THEM. THESE ARE SUBPOENAS TO PRIVATE ENTITIES. "
1 posted on
05/12/2020 11:49:34 AM PDT by
nwrep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: nwrep
2 posted on
05/12/2020 11:51:09 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: nwrep
3 posted on
05/12/2020 11:51:51 AM PDT by
timestax
To: nwrep
if true, recuse. immiediately.
4 posted on
05/12/2020 11:52:47 AM PDT by
SteveH
To: nwrep
5 posted on
05/12/2020 11:53:17 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: nwrep
Add her to the Obamagate Rico case, then send her to Gitmo with the rest.
6 posted on
05/12/2020 11:53:55 AM PDT by
EasySt
(Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
To: nwrep
Recuse Thyself!!!
7 posted on
05/12/2020 11:54:42 AM PDT by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
To: nwrep
Is it possible to impeach a SC Justice?
8 posted on
05/12/2020 11:56:01 AM PDT by
sauropod
(Quarantine is when you restrict sick people, tyranny is when you restrict healthy people.)
To: nwrep
Using the Majestic Plural there Sonia?
Or are you Plaintiff?
To: nwrep
All caps. Was that necessary? Did she scream it when she asked it?
11 posted on
05/12/2020 11:59:21 AM PDT by
be-baw
To: nwrep
Thus out of a person’s mouth comes the contents of their heart.
12 posted on
05/12/2020 11:59:47 AM PDT by
Psalm 73
To: nwrep
People make verbal gaffes all the time. If it was President Trump and CNN was pounding that slip 24/7 you would probably think he was being treated unfairly, and you would be right. Between the fact that we don’t have our own version of CNN and she doesn’t have a history of similar remarks the odds of her one verbal mistake leading to a recusal are somewhere between zero and not a snowball’s chance
To: nwrep
Sonya Sotomayor, attorney for the plaintiff.
17 posted on
05/12/2020 12:04:34 PM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: nwrep
Telling but of no importance. The important thing is the eventual decision. We knew her vote from the beginning.
18 posted on
05/12/2020 12:05:09 PM PDT by
SaxxonWoods
(Just sit in your house until the food stops coming and then starve. You'll be safe.)
To: nwrep
Wow I did not realize that AOC’s stupidity was contagious and spreading. Anybody that is anywhere near AOC needs to wear a Hazmat suit.
19 posted on
05/12/2020 12:05:12 PM PDT by
seawolf101
(Member LES DEPLORABLES)
To: nwrep
Why would “We” need to see his personal tax returns before he became President? Can the rest of us see your personal tax returns before you entered office?
To: nwrep; P-Marlowe
“WE” clearly shows siding with one of the litigants.
Will anyone do anything about it?
I doubt it. She’ll just say she was using an editorial “we”. And the media will fully support her.
21 posted on
05/12/2020 12:05:47 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
To: nwrep
22 posted on
05/12/2020 12:06:21 PM PDT by
fredmann
To: nwrep
Justice Sonya Sotomayor was and always a communist Democrat and not fit to be on the SC.
To: nwrep
Is anybody seriously surprised by this? I’m just surprised she doesn’t slip up and take sides more often.
25 posted on
05/12/2020 12:08:41 PM PDT by
drop 50 and fire for effect
("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.")
To: nwrep
She’d look nice on a gallows at GTMO.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson