Posted on 05/12/2020 2:05:49 PM PDT by robowombat
The libs have asserted that DJT has committed a crime, FALSELY, repeatedly. There is no law that mandates the release of tax history. Let them start there. Pass a law instead of going fishing for a potential crime with no evidence to obtain a warrantless search.
Nice try Kagen. What law do you allege Trump thinks he's above? The House has no evidence of a crime being committed. Without evidence of a crime, on what basis is the House entitled to a private citizen's tax returns, much less a President's.
Lawmakers want to have a look at PDJT’s taxes undoubtedly to make sure that he has never paid taxes that Congress cannot reasonably justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers. /sarc
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Send "Orange Man Bad" federal and state government Democrats and RINOs home in November!
Supporting PDJT with a new patriot Congress and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a third term in office imo.
Remember in November!
"The “Holy Grail” of organized crime is to control government power to tax." —me
"The power to tax involves the power to destroy, [...]” —Chief Justice John Marshall, McCulloch v. Maryland, 1819.
"The 16th Amendment effectively repealed the involuntary servitude aspect of the 13th Amendment imo, evidenced by unconstitutional federal taxes." —me
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"13th Amendment, Section 1:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude [emphasis added], except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
"16th Amendment:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
"It’s politically correct, under the Democratic Party and its tyrant judges, to use your voting power to make your fellow citizens involuntary servants." —me
"The ill-conceived 17th Amendment not only effectively politically repealed the 3/4 state supermajority requirement of the Constitution’s Article V for ratification of proposed amendments to the Constitution imo, politically correct interpretations of the Constitution now prevailing under Democratic judicial tyranny, but also consider this. That amendment also effectively nullified Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers along with the Supreme Court’s clarification of Congress’s limited power to appropriate taxes." —me
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"The constitutionally undefined political parties are basically rival, corrupt voter unions, “union dues” paid by means of unconstitutional federal taxes. Belonging to a political party means that you are a subject, not a member.” —me
"Patriots need to support PDJT in demanding that Congress moves "April 15" tax day to the day before election day." —me
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." —me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most appropriations laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." —me
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
If he does have to give up his tax records, can tax records from swamp dwellers also be disclosed? They better be careful what they ask for. From what I can see there are a LOT of gaters out there.
In both of the cases argued Tuesday, Trump lost every round of the battle in the lower courts.
But John Kruzel failed to write exactly why Trump lost every round of the lower court battles. Even though John Roberts has said that the Federal courts are not political, they are.
Case 1, Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP was consolidated with Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG.
Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP
Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG
Case 2, Trump v. Vance
As we can see, these cases have been decided politically, by Clinton and Obama political operatives on the Federal courts.
Apparently, DNC political operative John Kruzel did not see that.
Here’s hoping if he loses, Trump immediately requests the tax returns for the last 10 years of every SC justice, the obamas, every member of the Russia cabal, every democrat congress member, the democrat nut Vance in NY, along with every angry eneMedia member- for the last 10 years.
In that event, Trump would be unsuccessful since the courts would then rule that Trump's request would not have any legitimate purpose. Courts are controlled by the liberals.
Roberts will side with the left. They own him. He is allowed to vote with the right sometimes when it’s not that important but on all the big issues he is reliably on the left. This is a biggie to them.
I think trump should leak them. He says there accurate. He doesn’t do them anyway. Plus he said they are volumes full. That should keep them from screwing up the country for awhile.
Have we seen Obama’s college transcripts, or birth certificate?
I didn’t think so.
Concurrently release SCOTUS tax records.
I read through the entre transcript yesterday. It would appear to me that the biggest sticking point for the non-liberal justices is that there is apparently no limit the plaintiffs could come up with to the amount of harassment that the decision they are asking for would generate. Kavenaugh actually mentioned congress digging around for evidence of jaywalking.
Of course, given the setting, none of the justices or attorneys came right out and said how obviously political this entire case is. It is obvious from the breadth of the information request that they are looking for an unlimited way to dig for dirt in the president’s past. Doesn’t have to be illegal, or even immoral. All they want is something that they can drag out that will produce bad optics for the president. I’m quite sure they could find something, especially with the complexity of modern tax law. They’d find something that is pretty much standard practice that they could drag out and say, “look at this!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.