Posted on 05/13/2020 8:25:57 AM PDT by Kaslin
And the media know it.
When former president Barack Obama told supporters last week that the Justice Department’s decision to drop the case against former White House National Security Adviser Mike Flynn is a “threat to the rule of law,” he was relying wholly on the fiction, willingly propagated for years by a pliant media, that the Russia-Trump collusion probe launched by his administration was lawful and legitimate.
But of course it wasn’t. A string of recently released documents have confirmed that the entire Russia-Trump investigation, which eventually entrapped Flynn and forced then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself, was an unprecedented abuse of power that amounted to organized effort by the Obama administration to nullify the results of the 2016 presidential election. It was in effect an attempted coup.
If you haven’t picked that up from the news media, it’s not your fault. Instead of grappling with the implications of newly released details about what Obama officials were doing to undermine the incoming Trump administration during the transition, the mainstream media have fixated on Trump’s use of the term “Obamagate,” dismissing it as a conspiracy theory.
This is to be expected. For years now the media have done everything they can to push the Trump-Russia collusion hoax—even after a years-long special counsel investigation by Robert Mueller turned up nothing—using the complexity of the scheme to hide the greatest political scandal of our time in plain sight.
A key aspect of that scheme was—and is—to make the case against Flynn appear legitimate. Flynn faced trumped-up charges that he mislead FBI agents about conversations he had with then-Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the weeks before Trump’s inauguration. (As the incoming national security advisor, Flynn was doubtless having conversations with numerous heads of state and ambassadors during this time, so there was nothing unusual about him talking to the Russian ambassador.)
The Obama administration already knew about the conversations with Kislyak because it had recordings of them thanks to a series of investigations it spun out of the Crossfire Hurricane counterintelligence probe of the Trump campaign. Crossfire Hurricane, launched in the summer of 2016, was itself a bogus investigation based on the Steele dossier—an entirely fraudulent document riddled with Russian disinformation and paid for by the Democratic Party.
So why did the FBI want to interview Flynn ahead of Trump’s inauguration in January 2017? Top brass at the FBI weren’t exactly sure about their approach, but they knew they needed to get Flynn out of the way. As the bureau’s former head of counterintelligence, Bill Priestap, recorded in his notes, “What is our goal? Truth/Admission, or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”
Apparently the Obama administration settled on trying to entrap him in a lie. The recent disclosure of an early January 2017 Oval Office meeting attended by Obama, vice president Joe Biden, National Security Advisor Susan Rice, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, and FBI Director James Comey, confirms the administration’s plan to hide the Russia probe from the incoming Trump team—including Flynn.
The idea was to use the Kislyak calls as a pretext to keep the Flynn investigation open, even though there was no reason to do so. After months of spying on him, the FBI had found nothing to indicate Flynn was conspiring with the Russians.
As Rice wrote in an email to herself after the meeting, “President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”
The point was to keep the Flynn investigation open as a way for Obama holdovers like Comey, Yates, and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to continue the Russia-Trump collusion probe even after Trump took office—and keep Flynn, Trump’s national security advisor, out of the loop. Since there was no reason to keep investigating Flynn, the Obama administration invented one: the preposterous notion that he intentionally mislead Vice President Mike Pence about his conversations with Kislyak and then lied about it to the FBI.
There’s no evidence this happened, but even if there were it wouldn’t matter. As the Justice Department explained in its decision to drop the Flynn case, the investigation of Flynn was “untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation.”
Later, top FBI and Justice Department officials gave the House Intelligence Committee different answers about why they were pursuing Flynn. Comey, McCabe, Yates, and Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Mary McCord all gave conflicting testimony about the “primary purpose” of the FBI’s interview with Flynn, ranging from the outlandish notion that he violated the Logan Act—a constitutionally dubious 1799 law forbidding unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments—to the concocted charge that he lied to the FBI, which even the agents that conducted the interview with him didn’t believe.
The Flynn case is just one piece of a much larger story about how the Obama administration—with the full knowledge and support of both Obama and Biden—targeted incoming Trump officials in a failed attempt to cripple the new administration with allegations it had colluded with Moscow.
The complexity of their scheme, and the efforts to hide it and mislead the American people, are frustrating. The cast of characters—from high-ranking Obama administration officials to relative nobodies loosely associated with Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign—is long, as is the timeline of events. Details have come out slowly, in fits and starts, over the course of years. Following all the leaks and declassified transcripts and congressional hearings requires constant vigilance, and if you don’t keep up with it you can easily lose the thread.
That all works to the advantage of those who perpetrated this hoax, because it’s easy to get overwhelmed and tune it all out, or simply accept the corporate media’s deceptive reporting. But the ongoing revelations about the FBI’s targeting of Flynn can’t be ignored. They demand a full accounting. If ever there was a threat to the rule of law, it was the Obama administration’s abuse of power and its weaponization of intelligence agencies in an attempt to take down Trump.
However convoluted it might seem, pay attention to it. It’s the biggest political scandal of our time.
Michele O must be having a conniption over this.
Obama’s in HER spotlight. This was her time to let the world know what a (cough)
intelligent, attractive person she is, with her own Netflix movie out and a PBS show coming up.
She’s been whining over how having kids got in her way-——destroyed her very own dreams.
Nevertheless, she became Obama’s “equal” despite the setbacks.
Equal, eh? So what role did she play in the Obama games to “get Trump?” Eh?
And what did she do with the $100 million Obama gave her “to teach Muslim girls in Morocco-——
The 100 mill to be “held” by the Obama Foundation til needed (cackle)
Even here on FR we have people who will fight tooth and nail for the children of foreigners to be President, precisely what the founders were trying to prevent.
“”””<><>Keep in mind, at the time all the law-breaking happened, Hillary was a shoo-in...
<><> Obama had put the fix in.
<><>The entire intel apparat was at her disposal...all 17 billion dollar agencies.
<><> The media was at her feet..
<><> Hill’s campaign chair, Podesta, even hosted dinners at his home for select media types.””””
AND SHE STILL LOST !
That takes a special kind of repulsive.
Given the above, I maintain that Trump is a godsend and his election was miraculous.
The Clintons are experts at what I call The Double Deceit.
They layer one lie on top of another lie.
They even expect that the second lie will be discovered and examined.
The purpose of the second lie is to throw off any investigators of the original lie/crime.
The Clintons feel that time is on their side. If they can delay an investigation long enough, then they will have gotten away with their original crime.
The lie/crime against Flynn was just a lie/crime to delay the investigation and prosecution of the original crime/lie.
And that original lie/crime is?
The founders were smart.
If both immigrant parents were citizens at the time the child was born, it may be acceptable. The issue then would be foreign allegiance, which should be extinguished when they take the oath of loyalty when they gain citizenship. Some nations like England did at the time of the American Revolution, did not recognize our citizenship, they were conscripted often because they were English Subjects.
Children of Foreign born parents who are not citizens have no claim.
“ That’s a mighty risky course of action. They could go to prison for a while.”
Democrats can hijack a school bus, then torture and eat the children on live television, and their constituents will still think the orange man is bad
Note: here is where the article was posted on FR in 2009:
(Linkie no Workie)
Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report (7-28-09)
FR Comments: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2303258/posts
If the parents become citizens first then they are no longer foreigners and their children are natural born citizens.
If they are still foreigners, then so are their children, even if born here and also awarded US citizenship under a misinterpretation of the 14th amendment.
The same principle that allows Ted Cruz to claim US citizenship while born in Canada applies to all the children of foreigners born here.
Natural born citizens are naturally citizens of the US because they could not be anything else, they are born here of citizen parents.
Anyone born with more than ONE nationality is NOT a natural born citizen.
http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Without convictions and serious sentences handed out (up to and including Obama), then this whole exercise is not only a waste of time but an actual fraud perpetrated by the “rule of law” crowd with the intent of tricking us into thinking they stand for something. Without dire consequences for this kind of conduct, where is the deterrent to someone else trying it again.
Without convictions and sentences , our rule of law is a sham, we are not a serious people, and the Great American Experiment is effectively over.
Theory is when you lack the facts.
This is a real criminal conspiracy with Obama at the head.
It was pretty much over on Usurpation Day when both parties swore in a British subject/Kenyan/Indonesian non-natural born citizen in direct violation of the Constitution.
Words have meaning or the Constitution is an illusion.
Natural born citizens are naturally citizens because they simply could not be anything else.
Anyone who is also something else is NOT a natural born citizen.
btt
Is he trying to say we wouldn't have been monitoring the Russian ambassador's communications if it wasn't for Crossfire Hurricane?
Nonsense.
Agree
Nice deconstruction.
All that hyperbole and never any convictions, not even indictments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.