To: where's_the_Outrage?
Mr. Van Grack and Ms. Ballantine, the prosecutors on the case, acknowledged the facts but vociferously disagreed with Mr. Jensen’s legal argument that Mr. Flynn’s lies were immaterial to the larger investigation into Russian election interference, according to department lawyers familiar with their conversations.
How does what Flynn did after the election be material to "Russian election interference"?
How was Flynn's interaction with Turkey material in "Russian election interference"?
6 posted on
05/14/2020 4:47:05 AM PDT by
stylin19a
( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: stylin19a
They are starting to sound like kids making up stupid lies on the fly hoping to stay out of trouble. It won’t work.
8 posted on
05/14/2020 4:49:56 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: stylin19a
The whole Russian election interference was a complete hoax with many villains throughout the Democrat party, Obama administration and the MSM. And some villains in the Republican party. Many of the rats are getting nervous.
To: stylin19a
Funny (not really) that the article doesn’t mention that Van Grack headed for the hills right before the DOJ announced that they were dropping the case against Flynn.
13 posted on
05/14/2020 5:00:14 AM PDT by
ratzoe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson