To: lightman
We had to grit our teeth and accept it when a federal court first ruled that leftists burning an American flag in public was somehow “protected free speech.” How did it “speak”, we asked. Symbolic. Burning the flag was a form of statement in a way.
And an “artist” urinating on a statue or portrait of Jesus is protected.
A silly gag with a little doll? Oooooh. Dangerous. Watch out./s
9 posted on
05/14/2020 4:23:03 PM PDT by
frank ballenger
(End vote fraud,harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
To: frank ballenger
And an “artist” urinating on a statue or portrait of Jesus is protected.
This fruitcake had a right to create that, ahem, artwork but with TAXPAYER'S $$$$? Let the ultra rich artsy fartsy types fund this type of dreck.Besides what would happen if a Koran got the same treatment?
62 posted on
05/14/2020 6:12:01 PM PDT by
Impala64ssa
(Virtue signalling is no virtue)
To: frank ballenger
The doll should have been wearing a swastika, but there were concerns about violating Goodwins Law.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson