While this guy is right, he's also an idiot.
Obama was talking about the PENDING perjury charges that Judge O'Derpo is trying to wrangle out of a nothing case. He contends, in as few words as possible, that Flynn committed perjury by pleading guilty, the proof being that he changed his plea to not guilty. That the plea itself was a lie to the court, in other words (which it kinda was, to be honest, but an irrelevant lie since thee was no predicating case).
So, yea. I couldn't finish the rest of this article after having read that. Chances are that there are some good ideas in there that I'll miss, but I'll take that chance and most likely I already know them anyway.
If they charge Flynn for perjury for knowingly entering a “dishonest” plea, they should also be able to charge the prosecutors and his lawyer with suborning perjury since it was done at the prosecution’s demand and his lawyer’s recommendation. Does this mean that anyone who pleads innocent and is subsequently found guilty can have an additional charge of perjury added on?