Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil
“there is no set of facts that could support a claim for defamation based on Maddow’s statement”.

This judge is either ruling that it's impossible for Maddow's statement to be false or that it's impossible for that Maddow was deliberately lying. Of course exploring those questions is the very purpose of going to trial. This loon is essentially claiming to be omniscient, if we take her statement literally.

26 posted on 05/22/2020 9:52:01 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lasereye
This loon is essentially claiming to be omniscient, if we take her statement literally.

Fakejudge Barbie here can read the mind of Rachel Maddow and all her listeners and KNOW that none of them believe her "opinion" - including Maddow herself.

Despite all the public evidence to the contrary on Twitter and Facebook...

27 posted on 05/22/2020 11:42:19 PM PDT by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson