Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

I am well read on the case and know it better than you. Which is why my prediction will again be proven correct.

You are wrong.

The Appeals Court responded very aggressively to Judge Sullivan’s ridiculous action against General Flynn in his refusal to remove his fingers from around General Flynn’s neck.

I am well informed and know full well the Appeals Court did not take well to Sullivan’s briefing scheduling opening up an amicus briefing schedule.

You just can’t handle that I’m going to be right again. It bothers you but I don’t care.

General Flynn follows me on Twitter. No one cares about what you think and inability to recognize the June 1 Appeals Court deadline to Judge Sullivan.

You’ve insisted this is all about delay and I’ve insisted it’s all about the pending victory for General Flynn.

So, I’m quite confident I will be correct here once more.


190 posted on 05/24/2020 10:29:46 AM PDT by romanesq (Flubro, from the people who brought you the stupidity of grifters & the letter Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: romanesq

> “I am well read on the case and know it better than you ...”

Great, then answer what happens procedural to court rules AFTER the June 1 Response is filed.

List the actual posted rules, not your opinion but the actual rules to be followed AFTER June 1.

List the rule numbers, links and procedures here.

This should be easy for you because you insist you know so much.


191 posted on 05/24/2020 10:36:19 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson