I see. You’re predicting June 1 the appellate court will handle ‘something”.
I suppose you think they are not going to read Wilkinson’s response for Sullivan, just wave their hands and say Sullivan sucks.
Uh-huh.
You’ve got nothing of value to add here other than you’re a narcissistic A—h——.
> “I’ve stated it will be ***sooner than later***. You have not countered with any date. If you dare Hostage, I will follow your prediction and beat you once again!”
What a frickin load of bleep.
I predicted when the appellate court ORDERED Sullivan to address his actions in light of the Fokker case, I predicted Sullivan would dismiss and not bother to respond. I was wrong.
So there’s already been a delay because the Obama-Hillary mafia decided Sullivan’s getting a well-connected DC lawyer to write his response to the appeals court. And the question I have on this thread and others is how long will be the delay. I have received info from lawyers that is quite useful.
The question is how much more delay is possible. Your BS answer is ***sooner than later***. My dog could predict that.
Get lost!
When she submits then at some point I’ll read Wilkinson’s argument on behalf of Sullivan and see how she’ll attempt to use the same Fokker case to advantage.
You don’t know what I’m going to do or say. You’re just angry that I’m correct this week and will be again.
I am not ruling out that Sullivan will hold no card and issue a dismissal but I haven’t predicted that outcome in this instance. I would like it to go that way but that’s not my prediction.
You’re obviously afraid to pick a date for a final outcome. You should because I’ll pick a different date and you’ll be wrong and I’ll be closer to the correct outcome.
You’re afraid. You’re a hostage to your ego. Sucks to be you.