Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newnhdad

Really? A federal judge hires a lawyer? Unheard of. Ever.
Can only be for one purpose, Sullivan feels a need to be defended? That thought has me thrilled. Hot air from his bosses and public opinion breathing onhis neck thrills me.
IMHO. Payment to the lawyer by the tax payers wouldn’t sit well with the Appellant court,and successfully challenged.


27 posted on 05/23/2020 3:02:55 PM PDT by drdirt333 (DRDIRT333)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: drdirt333

How is this any different then filing an amicus brief, which the circuit court told him was not allowed?


30 posted on 05/23/2020 3:06:08 PM PDT by CaptainK ('No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: drdirt333
Judges hire people all the time. Just because they are a judge does not mean they are experts in some areas. Judges hire people for many business law cases to help them understand things.

The Supreme Court hires people for many cases. They are not experts in many things. They hire them as advisers and they often hire them to actually figure out technical issues. For example, I recall a border dispute between Maryland and Virginia about 10 or 20 years ago. The Supreme Court hired a team to figure it out and they made a recommendation and the Court went with the recommendation.

123 posted on 05/23/2020 5:43:43 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson