“If a social-media company chooses to continue censoring, they will be exposed to ruinous lawsuits. That’s got to make a difference. I’m sure Jim would agree.
FR is protected by exactly the same Section 230 and is going to subject to everything in this EO that Twitter is.
No more deleted posts and no more zots.”
The easy fix for this would be for all those who donate to become monthly subscribers. Then Jim still gets the revenue, people still get posts deleted for blatant violations but become an even more open forum of viewpoints. I think a subscription would change the legal dynamics but I am no lawyer.
If that were true all Twitter would have to do is offer free subscriptions.
It really doesn't change anything legally.
The bigger issue is what terms of service did you agree to before using any of these services.