Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

“Do you think the treaty would have happened if the least wasn’t expiring?”

That’s debatable.

But it’s a far cry from what you initially asserted and what I responded to:

“The lease expired. Without going to war there was nothing UK could do.”


73 posted on 05/29/2020 2:33:38 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan

It’s not debatable!! There’s no reason at all to give up the 8% if they’re not losing the 92%. It’s RIGHT in line with what I said. China made it clear the lease would NOT be renewed period. Both sides understood that splitting the parts was a stupid idea. They made a treaty and gave up the land. Because they had NO OTHER OPTION. Only way the UK was keeping it was going to war. They knew that. China knew that. And if you weren’t a damned liar you’d know that. We’re done, you’re a liar and an idiot. have the last word, it won’t be read.


74 posted on 05/29/2020 2:36:34 PM PDT by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson