[woodpusher]

[Woodpusher] No physical findings to support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation.

[grey_whiskers] The proof that you're a troll,. I found in a DuckDuckGo search in 30 seconds that Traumatic Asphyxiation refres to compression of the thorax (chest) until the blood flows the wrong way out of the heart.

it has nothing to do with a knee on the neck.

Well, good your ignorant butt. You found DuckDuckGo. Now go find the Statement of Probable Cause. It states, "The autopsy revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation."

Does that look familiar, troll? A troll ain't so bad, but such an incompetent troll is a bit much.

[grey_whiskers]

You're a very incompetent troll. And yes, it is a bit much. I now have you openly contradicting yourself within your own post, and in your desperation, thinking that it reflects on me. Your lines in blue say

"The autopsy revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis ofTRAUMATIC ASPHYXIA or strangulation.".

Right. The coroner says he DIDN'T die of it.

But we already knew that.

Traumatic asphyxia is getting your chest crushed by a giant press like the Terminator in the first movie.

Not a knee on the neck.

So the only reason for the coroner to mention that, is he's either incompetent and doesn't know the difference, or he's throwing out impressive sounding words to fool people like you into thinking it exonerated the policeman rightly charged with 3rd degree murder.

Sounds like it worked like a charm.