Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy
President Trump has no interest in mobilizing Federal troops to maintain order in states around the country. Politically, there is no upside to having the U.S. military using tear gas, batons and armored vehicles against U.S. citizens.

He shrewdly claimed that he WOULD do it for one purpose: to make Democrats come out and publicly oppose it.

We are already seeing the result of this masterful approach. There are governors and state AGs clamoring to legally challenge the President to stop him from doing something he doesn't want to do anyway.

20 posted on 06/02/2020 5:35:23 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Good comment. I agree.


22 posted on 06/02/2020 5:38:20 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

POTUS is crazy...like a fox.


43 posted on 06/02/2020 7:39:26 AM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
"President Trump has no interest in mobilizing Federal troops to maintain order in states around the country. Politically, there is no upside to having the U.S. military using tear gas, batons and armored vehicles against U.S. citizens.

He shrewdly claimed that he WOULD do it for one purpose: to make Democrats come out and publicly oppose it.

We are already seeing the result of this masterful approach. There are governors and state AGs clamoring to legally challenge the President to stop him from doing something he doesn't want to do anyway."

I agree with this assessment, plus I'd add to it. If you recall Trump's actions at the outset of the Wuhan Virus emergency measures, Trump was ahead of State Governors and big-city Mayors every step of the way. Literally every time one of those do-nothing Dems tried to point the finger at Trump as the party at fault, it boomeranged right back at them. Whether it was ventilators in desperate need, getting "scientists" to deliver messaging directly, to putting medical-care ships in NY and California to handle the hospital overflows, he literally boxed them in. He made these weak politicians accountable to the citizens of their States and Cities. And they squirmed like pigs, and squealed like little girls that saw a spider.

He's doing it again here - putting expectations and accountability where it belongs: on the Governors and Mayors. The left is now pointing out FOR him, he does not have the power to unilaterally send in the US military (unless he exercises his powers under the Insurrection Act). Simultaneously, the lefty Governors and Mayors are tacitly admitting that THEY have the responsibility to address the violence, and also own the results of their actions (or in-actions).

If the Dems (media or elected officials) now try to say that Trump is at fault for failing to prevent violence and looting, he just has to point back to those same folks' statements that he doesn't have the power to do that. Note also that Trump volunteered the full support of the Federal government resource to help if they need it - they only have to ask. Not only is this the way the law works, it puts the Dems in a tight-spot: again, either "owning" the situation directly, or asking Trump for assistance. We'll see which they find more distasteful.

44 posted on 06/02/2020 7:39:57 AM PDT by Be Free (When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson