Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia declares state of emergency after massive oil spill in the Arctic Circle
CNBC ^ | 4 June 2020 | Holly Ellyatt

Posted on 06/04/2020 4:26:24 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT

President Vladimir Putin has declared a state of emergency in a region within the Arctic Circle in far northern Russia.

The move comes after 20,000 tons of oil leaked into a river from a power plant.

The plant is operated by a subsidiary of Norilsk Nickel, a leading palladium and nickel producer.

Discussing how news of the spill emerged in the televised meeting, Putin was reportedly shocked to discover that local authorities had only learned of the incident from social media two days after it happened, and he admonished the region’s governor Alexander Uss, Reuters reported.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: huge
CRAP! Just when I might need a new catalytic converter.
1 posted on 06/04/2020 4:26:24 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT
The Exxon Valdez spill was 37,000 tons.

This is a bit more than half that, assuming the Russians are correctly reporting the size of the discharge, which if you believe that I've got a bridge to sell you.

The MSM screamed bloody murder about the Exxon Valdez for years.

2 posted on 06/04/2020 4:31:33 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrats' John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Notice how when it’s one of the MSM’s little friends, the measurement unit is Tonnes, not barrels or gallons.

Makes for a MUCH smaller number that way

SHEESH


3 posted on 06/04/2020 4:38:11 PM PDT by Oscar in Batangas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

4 posted on 06/04/2020 4:41:00 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

This was diesel the Exxon Valdez was carrying crude.

Not good but the diesel being lighter may have a higher volatile content? A good wind may remove a quarter of it???

Guessing, do not know.


5 posted on 06/04/2020 4:44:26 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

So how many Russians will they be needing up there for cleanup efforts (if this is not being exploited for some other reason)?


6 posted on 06/04/2020 4:45:30 PM PDT by BlackAdderess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Hey Greta!


7 posted on 06/04/2020 4:45:34 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Sure. Why not. It’s 2020.

All we need now is a new radioactive monster from Chernobyl.


8 posted on 06/04/2020 4:45:49 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT
local authorities had only learned of the incident from social media two days after it happened

You've got to be kidding me. Send them to Siberia! Oh wait, never mind.

9 posted on 06/04/2020 4:48:07 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Let’s see, only learned about it from social media after a reported two days? Yeah, I suspect it is quite a bit bigger than 20,000 tons unless that is the size of all the storage tanks and they reported that correctly.


10 posted on 06/04/2020 4:48:31 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (We are governed by the consent of the governed and we are fools for allowing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

I believe it will bio-degrade much faster than crude oil.

.


11 posted on 06/04/2020 4:52:43 PM PDT by TLI (ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Probably did it on purpose, to give anti-pipeline American progressives fodder. I don’t know -— do evil communist presidents like Putin care about the effects of oil spills?


12 posted on 06/04/2020 4:54:28 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

I would air drop in all the crap in the streets I e been seeing on tv for a week. Once there light it up.


13 posted on 06/04/2020 4:55:12 PM PDT by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

My thought also.


14 posted on 06/04/2020 5:27:20 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT
They can do better

Say, like they did in the Komi Republic back in '95


15 posted on 06/04/2020 6:35:28 PM PDT by ASOC (Having humility really means one is rarely humiliated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom; DUMBGRUNT; TLI; Flaming Conservative
The MSM screamed bloody murder about the Exxon Valdez for years.

Which spill was tragic and preventable, but the MSM does more damage by spilling sophistry and propaganda, and I doubt that any of them provided any reports such as,

naturally occurring oil seeps from the seafloor are the largest source of oil entering the world ocean? (https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/oilseep.html)

[2000] Twice an Exxon Valdez spill worth of oil seeps into the Gulf of Mexico every year, according to a new study...Oil that finds its way to the surface from natural seeps gets broken down by bacteria and ends up as carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas...."On water, oil has this wonderful property of spreading out really thin," said Mitchell. "A gallon of oil can spread over a square mile very quickly." So what ends up on the surface is an incredibly thin slick, impossible to see with the human eye and harmless to marine animals. (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/01/000127082228.htm)

[2003] Recent global estimates of crude-oil seepage rates suggest that about 47% of crude oil currently entering the marine environment is from natural seeps, whereas 53% results from leaks and spills during the extraction, transportation, refining, storage, and utilization of petroleum. The amount of natural crude-oil seepage is currently estimated to be 600,000metric tons per year, with a range of uncertainty of 200,000 to 2,000,000metric tons per year. Thus, natural oil seeps may be the single most important source of oil that enters the ocean, exceeding each of the various sources of crude oil that enters the ocean through its exploitation by humankind. (Kvenvolden, Keith & Cooper, Cortis. (2003). Natural seepage of crude oil into the marine environment. Geo-Marine Letters. 23. 140-146. 10.1007/s00367-003-0135-0. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225679680_Natural_seepage_of_crude_oil_into_the_marine_environment/citation/download)

[2009] "Natural Petroleum Seeps Release Equivalent Of Up To 80 Exxon Valdez Oil Spills." According to new research by scientists from UC Santa Barbara and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), that's how much oil has made its way into sediments offshore from petroleum seeps near Coal Oil Point in the Santa Barbara Channel... "One of the natural questions is: What happens to all of this oil?" Valentine said. "So much oil seeps up and floats on the sea surface. It's something we've long wondered. We know some of it will come ashore as tar balls, but it doesn't stick around. And then there are the massive slicks. You can see them, sometimes extending 20 miles from the seeps. But what is really the ultimate fate?"

Based on their previous research, Valentine and Reddy surmised that the oil was sinking "because this oil is heavy to begin with," Valentine said. "It's a good bet that it ends up in the sediments because it's not ending up on land. It's not dissolving in ocean water, so it's almost certain that it is ending up in the sediments." (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090513130944.htm)

16 posted on 06/04/2020 6:35:45 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

20000 tons x 7 barrels per ton = 140,000 barrels.


17 posted on 06/04/2020 7:24:59 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson