Posted on 06/06/2020 12:10:01 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Nobody ever claimed it was effective for hospitalized patients. Its’ benefits are for people with mild symptoms and as a prevention.
Zpak might or might not be necessary in a prophylactic regimen but Dr. Zelenko includes it. He has a prphylactic regimen I posted previously but would need to find it. He discusses it in one of his interviews with Rabbi Katzin.
Also need ECG on Day zero and Day two, to check for arrhythmia or other adverse heart effects. Stop immediately if any signs appear.
Nice a drug that works prevented from curing people for leftist political reason. And yet we sit on our hands.
In the meantime no other drug or treatment has shown any effectiveness against this disease.
So if you or a loved one gets it, what are you going to do?
I know I will be demanding the HCQ treatment with Zinc and an Antibiotic.
These biased medical studies are the equivalent of the "disband the police" rhetoric that we are hearing.
Anything to increase the chaos and prolong the misery.
Lancet retracted the article yesterday.....
I have NEVER in my life met or spoken to an “EXPERT” who could find his/her own ass, even using both hands.
It’s very good for healthy people that develop COVID-19 and can’t breathe and are rushed to the hospital, admitted and treated right away.
Patients that are hospitalized with other severe illnesses won’t be miraculously cured because they are so sick from other things and are expected to die from those other things, called comorbidities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwZ509bPD6k
A really, really good analogy is that of a fire breaking out and catching it early compared to a fire breaking out that gets out of control and destroys everything,
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3852796/posts?page=11#11
Without plenty of zinc it may even be harmful. It transports zinc into the cells so they can fight off virus.
Disappointed with Reason taking this political position in reporting a review of a study of results on a medication which has become politicized without seeking input from knowledgeable sources.
I think the Brits will send them to the NHS where people go to die.
Nobody ever claimed it was effective for hospitalized patients. Its’ benefits are for people with mild symptoms and as a prevention.//
Yep that has been the case almost from the beginning.
Past a certain point, nothing works. However, I hope the Brits aren’t sighting that now trash medical journal Lancet.
An "EX" is a has-been, and a "SPURT" is a Drip under pressure.
They just admitted they didn’t add zinc so why should I listen. You have to give it to patients not on a respirator or close to death and you have to use zinc. Why is this so hard to understand?
It’s intended as an early treatment or preventive, and we’ve always known it doesn’t do any good after the virus has progressed beyond minor symptoms. SHeesh. Use a drug the opposite of how it’s intended and it doesn’t do anything. Surprise, surprise.
Two more foreign agents that need to be boxed.
Partisan Media Shills update.
It has to be given early for it to work.
If someone is on a ventilator, it’s too late by then.
It seems more likely that science does not work. One “study” had more deaths than they had participants in the study. Follow the money.
I’ll stick to my daily gin & tonic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.