Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb

RE: increase in life expectancy means there will soon be too few workers able to support an enormous and aging population.

OK, there’s an assumption here which I’m not sure is valid... if this becomes an irreversible problem, why would an atheistic, utilitarian government bother to support the aging population? Why not just let them die off?


20 posted on 06/06/2020 7:49:34 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

“Why not just let them die off?”
..............
There is a cultural veneration for ancestors. But it is expensive to feed and house the elderly that are no longer productive.
.............
Today’s Chinese elderly are living much longer than say even 20 years ago.
...........
Many fertile young women have new economic options and aren’t having kids. The one child policy ended years ago but the birth rate continues to drop.


27 posted on 06/06/2020 8:09:01 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson