Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman
“The police officer was, he was very nice. He explained to me that he was coming to address an issue with my son's school,” Lancaster said.

“And then explained to me that he was here to search for weapons, in my home. And I consented to let him in. And then I, unfortunately, stood there and watched police officers enter my 11-year-old son's bedroom.”

The correct response is ONLY this: "Hello, officer, I would be very glad to help with your investigation, but only with a warrant or my attorney present. Here is his/her number if you would like to meet there. Have a nice day and please leave".

5 posted on 06/12/2020 9:43:47 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (COMDEMS would rather rule over a pile of ashes, than lose to Trump and REAL Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DCBryan1
You are correct, but then the cop would have called Child Protective Services, forced entry, arrested the mother for endangering the child when the BB gun was found and CPS would have scooped the kid off to foster care.

It would have taken months of legal wrangling (bankrupting the family) to get the kid back.

Utterly unconstitutional, but now standard operating procedure.

14 posted on 06/12/2020 9:58:53 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson