Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Did anyone else notice the lack of interest by these fetid black robed leaches in the criminal activity by the prosecution?
Not a single question about the outrageous behavior by their fellow DC attorneys working for the DOJ crime family.
And what has fellow traveler sullivan done about the fraud committed on the court by the executive branch?


15 posted on 06/12/2020 4:50:54 PM PDT by glasseye ("A policeman's job is only easy in a police state." Orson Welles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: glasseye

Yep. Not one question.


16 posted on 06/12/2020 4:53:48 PM PDT by tennmountainman (The Liberals Are Baby Killers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: glasseye

The panel is only supposed to decide what is in the motions before them.

We all know Flynn was targeted by a conspiracy of government officials to falsely charge him with a crime.

However, the motion before the court is simple on the legal merits. The government (DOJ) has told the court that they want to dismiss the case with prejudice because they do not believe they could prove the case at trial and they do not believe there was any crime committed.

They did not go into the fact that Flynn was a victim of a crime by the government. They purposely tried to avoid that just as the “court” is trying to avoid the politics of the case.

Barr is old school. If (or when if allowed) Sullivan wants to drag this out much longer I think Barr is obligated to notify the court that there are many more legitimate reasons to dismiss the case because DOJ now possesses information (Durham) that would be deemed exculpatory.

DOJ has tried to avoid “going there”, but they may be left with no choice because Sullivan does not want to give up on the coup. Remember, Flynn was the “crown jewel” of the Mueller crew... the biggest name on the board.

I think the conduct was so egregious based on what we now know that DOJ will likely move to vacate all of the cases prosecuted by Mueller. If they leave a case alone it would likely be Manafort, but even that one should be vacated for the blatant partisanship and bad acts in my opinion.

We will have to wait another month, but my suspicions are that Barr will address the court if this is not dismissed. I think he will have to.


35 posted on 06/12/2020 6:06:37 PM PDT by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: glasseye

That is neither surprising nor improper. The prosecutorial malfeasance was not before the court, yet.


40 posted on 06/12/2020 6:38:46 PM PDT by MortMan (Shouldn't "palindrome" read the same forward and backward?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: glasseye

BINGO!!~! They couldn’t care LESS about how corrupt the DEEP STATE IS! That one judge asked “WHAT IF” questions...like a TEENAGER would!<P”WHAT IF” Questions are for the BRAINDEAD!


49 posted on 06/13/2020 2:20:38 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson