“Gorsuch ... says “discrimination based on homosexuality or transgender status necessarily entails discrimination based on sex; the first cannot happen without the second.””
A non sequitur. I’m very disappointed in Gorsuch on this one. He prides himself on following the law to the letter. He made the law up on this one.
As to Roberts—nothing surprises me anymore on his rulings.
Transgender and homosexuality are behavioral traits and to hear the shrinks tell it, there are 52 genders and they are fluid meaning it can change from day to day.
They’re using bailey and motte arguments to twist the meaning of words, and that was very intentional. They could have ruled on 2 cases to say you can’t fire a man for being homosexual and left OUT transgenderism.
Gorsuch thinks like a Colorado hipster.