To: Borges
Isn’t #4 another way of describing communism?
To: Dilbert San Diego
It’s the primary way to describe it.
4 posted on
06/22/2020 8:27:12 PM PDT by
Borges
To: Dilbert San Diego
I do not want to have to pay taxes for that then since only certain people will be recognized screw that. Those policies are discriminatory.
12 posted on
06/22/2020 8:31:32 PM PDT by
funfan
To: Dilbert San Diego
15 posted on
06/22/2020 8:35:04 PM PDT by
pnut22
To: Dilbert San Diego
Isn’t #4 another way of describing communism?
It's impossible to have collective ownership without communism, so yes.
23 posted on
06/22/2020 8:48:18 PM PDT by
FormerFRLurker
(Keep calm and vote your conscience.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
30 posted on
06/22/2020 9:09:33 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Some of the folks around these parts have been sniffing super flu.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
Pure Marxism. Farms, industry, cafes, shops....all would have to be society-ownership, nothing private. You could go as far as saying all NFL and NBA teams would be society-ownership, and the players would only be paid ‘fair’ wages. On every level of test and practice over the past 150-odd years...it’s failed.
To: Dilbert San Diego
a “clear vision of the world where black humanity and dignity is the reality?”......
45 posted on
06/22/2020 11:44:16 PM PDT by
caww
To: Dilbert San Diego
Why on earth do these folks see communism as the greatest form of equality...they have it now right in front of their faces yet want to throw it all away.
54 posted on
06/23/2020 5:09:32 AM PDT by
jughandle
(Big words anger me, keep talking.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
What the hell #6 supposed to mean?
57 posted on
06/23/2020 6:16:10 AM PDT by
MrChips
("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson