Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Explosive New FBI Notes Confirm Obama Directed Anti-Flynn Operation
The Federalist ^ | JUNE 24, 2020 | Sean Davis and Mollie Hemingway

Posted on 06/24/2020 12:38:27 PM PDT by Mount Athos

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: conservativepoet

Obama should be impeached and lose his pension, security, all of it.


61 posted on 06/24/2020 3:39:48 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: malach

I think there is a way for Flynn to sue all these creeps, see this link below, did they violate the constitution or any federal laws in their actions? See middle paragrah https://www.justice.gov/jm/civil-resource-manual-33-immunity-government-officers-sued-individuals

33. IMMUNITY OF GOVERNMENT OFFICERS SUED AS INDIVIDUALS FOR OFFICIAL ACTS

The general rule at common law was that in order for a government official to be protected by absolute immunity for common law torts, not only did the official have to be acting within the outer perimeter of his/her official duties, but the conduct at issue also had to be discretionary in nature. Westfall v. Irwin, 484 U.S. 292, 297-298 (1988). In enacting the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988 (FELRTCA), Congress abrogated this common law rule and extended absolute immunity for common law torts to all federal employees regardless of whether the conduct at issue was discretionary. See United States v. Smith, 499 U.S. 160 (1991). FELRTCA confers such immunity by making the Federal Tort Claims Act the exclusive remedy for all common law torts committed by federal employees while acting within the scope of their office or employment. 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1).

However, the immunity conferred by FELRTCA does not extend or apply to suits against federal employees for violation of the Constitution or federal statutes. Thus, government officials sued for constitutional torts continue to be protected only by qualified immunity.

28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(2). See Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 807 (1982); Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478 (1978). Where applicable, qualified immunity protects an official from trial and the burdens of litigation. See Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 (1985).


62 posted on 06/24/2020 3:47:21 PM PDT by WonkyTonky (Lenin said that Socialism is the first step toward Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Mount Athos

Yeah. That’s pretty damning.


64 posted on 06/24/2020 6:42:11 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Colonel Nathan R. Jessup would disagree...


65 posted on 06/24/2020 6:53:26 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: virgil

No he should still get his pension and security. Provided by Gitmo.


66 posted on 06/25/2020 6:46:55 AM PDT by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

67 posted on 06/25/2020 7:09:15 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson