Posted on 06/25/2020 4:18:26 AM PDT by Kaslin
Theres a basic rule that far too many conservatives ignore: if some alleged conservative principle makes you less free, then its not a good conservative principle and you should toss it in the trash. After all, principles are merely shorthand for the best practices of a just society. When some alleged principle helps leftists enserf-ify you, then its a pretty Schiffy principle, isnt it?
Weaponizing principles is one of the lefts favorite tactics, and its right out of Alinsky 101. Rule for Radical No. 4 is "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." And it works really well, right up until the moment that you stop playing by the rules that the left is trying to jam down your throat.
Now, the objection to my view offered in good faith by good faith conservatives (you old softies) and in bad faith by the cruise-shilling Fredocon hacks who make common cause with our enemies is that this kind of wokeness makes one unprincipled. It doesnt. Those of us who see whats happening and refuse to go full lemming never go full lemming are not abandoning conservative principles. Were just not trying to hold onto the alleged principles that have abandoned us.
This comes up a lot recently as the left has redoubled its efforts to weaponize our principles to create a monopoly on power. Weve seen Big Tech do it for a while now, but today its happening even more. The idea is to leverage our purported beliefs so that we are diverted from protecting and asserting our own interests by blind adherence to a version of conservative dogma that our opponents force-feed us and that we, for some reason, all too often fail to puke back up all over them like a supermodel exiting a Golden Corral.
Time to get woke to the scam and stop playing their no-win game.
One of the best examples of this is the argument that we conservatives cannot make a moral argument against, or use their political power to provide legal remedies to, the liberal cancellation game. This game is the informal process by which individuals and companies deter dissent and enforce conformity of thought and expression by threatening and sometimes destroying the livelihood of dissenters. One of the conservative principles we aspire to is individual choice, manifesting in not interfering with the choices of individuals and companies over who they do business with. This often means a conservative is stifled or fired.
But another conservative principle is freedom of expression. This is distinct from the First Amendment, which bars the government from preventing or punishing free speech. The left makes a great deal of this distinction Cancelling you racist sexist cisgender monsters does not violate the First Amendment, and individual and companies have a right not to do business with anyone they want when we seek to use our power to correct these outrages. The lib objection sounds plausible, until you understand that individuals and companies punishing you by preventing you from earning a livelihood is as much of a punishment as the government coming and punishing you under criminal law except in the cancellation kangaroo court you have no rights, no due process, and no appeal. And, in fact, this is not even an accurate representation of the allegedly operative principle. We already bar individuals and companies from discriminating on the basis of many attributes race, sex, religion. Whats the wait for it! principle that bars all that kind of garbage invidious discrimination, yet somehow requires us to accept invidious discrimination on the basis of our political views, specifically views that are pro-American?
There is not one, and there is no valid principle preventing us from demanding formal legal protection. States like mine, California, actually already have political discrimination protection laws (check a competent lawyer in your jurisdiction if this issue comes up for you). But some argue that because we cons generally support allowing individuals and companies to run their businesses as they choose, were supposed to allow them to drive us conservatives out of full participation in society merely because we like America and dare say so?
After all, liberals control almost all the major institutions of society. The premise that a coder can just go across the street to a more tolerant version of Google, or that an oppressed professor can go grab tenure at one of the myriad conservative colleges, is nonsense. They have the power that comes from infiltrating institutions, but we have the power that comes from winning elections, yet were not supposed to use our power to enact laws that protect ourselves when the left uses its power against us without restraint?
Nope, not buying it. The politicians we support should be aggressively pushing regulation and legislation to protect our rights. BUT CONSERVATIVES ARE SUPPOSED TO HATE REGULATION! Yeah, maybe, but we definitely hate being oppressed. After all, any principle that is construed in a manner that makes us second-class citizens, unable to speak without the threat of retaliation, is not a principle worth having.
When they tell us that our own beliefs to which they do not subscribe force us to accept serfdom, we need to tell them to go pound sand.
Then there is the cancellation selection criteria issue. Some people are more cancellable than others. The insufferable liberal Jimmy Kimmel utters racial epithets and prances about in blackface, but hes cool. But if a patriot like you accurately observes that all lives matter instead of just some of them, youre Bull Connor II: Electric Boogaloo. Please point out what principle makes that cool so I can light it on fire and watch it burn.
Of course, we have not stood for this double standard, and many social media cons took a break from following Jesse Kellys admonition to #CancelYale Elihu Yale built Yale on the skulls and bones of slaves to demand Kimmels ritual defenestration. We were then informed that demanding cancellation is not what conservatives do.
Well, its what conservatives who refuse to accept dual-track justice do. See, they dont get to win.
As I have pointed out before, there are three scenarios in descending order of preferability.
Option 1: We all live freely and say what we wish and no one gets canceled.
Option 2: Conservatives get canceled, but liberals get canceled too.
Option 3: Conservatives get canceled, but liberals never get canceled.
My preference is Option 1, everyone says whatever they want and no one gets canceled. This seems like the best arrangement, and until recently it seemed to be the one that we had adopted as a society. If we cant have Option 1, then we will take Option 2, mutually assured destruction. But Option 3, liberals do whatever they want and we get gagged, is a non-starter. They do not get to win.
Hence, Jimmy Kimmel must be canceled. Maybe this will inspire them to return to Option 1, but maybe not. What is not happening is that we get locked in the social gimp box and they get to do whatever. Nope.
Any principle that applies to us but not to them is not a principle but a mini suicide pact, and were not doing it.
Principles are nice things to have. They are a marker of a healthy society. But today our society is not healthy, and we are not morally obligated to pretend that it is by observing to our own detriment norms and rules that are not universally applicable. And we wont cure what is wrong with society by further empowering those who have sickened it at the expense of our own liberty.
My principle is freedom, and any principle that doesnt make me freer is not a principle worth having.
Conservative Principles, yes... and also a lot of firepower, with the will to USE it.
And never ever accept the number 666.
When the time comes I am ready to deliver my conservative principles 5.56mm at time.
We shouldn’t be “principled” passive targets but the left has a couple of advantages. They have billionaires who are happy to spend money on lawyers for years on “lawfare” just to close down a mom and pop bakery. Do we have anything like that? A business owner who does not say the right politically correct slogans won’t just get angry letters from leftists. They know an angry mob throwing rocks and fire bombs will show up. Maybe a deranged leftist will show up with a gun. The left backs up their every whim with the promise of violence, and they don’t care who they hurt. Are we willing to go there? And the leftists can count on lenient courts - we could not get away with jaywalking.
The leftists say they want to smash “the system” but nowadays they for the most part are the system. They don’t want any dissent at all, they cannot tolerate anyone different from them. I don’t see how we can just jockey for a small victory here and there within the left’s system.
I am going to stop reading articles that refer to these collectivist totalitarian leftists as liberals. There are no liberals left in that deranged party.
John 8:36
If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed
Option 2: Conservatives get canceled, but liberals get canceled too.
Option 2 ended the MeToo movement. Tara Reade-Joe Biden
That's true, but mob rule and the law of the jungle do.
The author makes some interesting points here. Me thinks he stumbles upon a problem for conservatives, which is another principle. We can never get our act together, “collectively”, to value one principle over another. Conservatives share a lot of principles, but not equally. A lot of arguments on this board occur when one poster values one principle more than another poster. It doesn’t mean both posters don’t believe the same things, it just shows how one’s personal life experience make them value one thing over another. The problem with this is most conservatives value individual liberty so much, that they don’t collectively go along with “group think”, even if is based off a conservative principle. The left has no problems with this. Perhaps it is a lack of principles on their part or such a overwhelming shared principle to win at any expense regardless of other things they say and do.
.
Bump
YES!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.