[teeman8r]

does this mean that now we can bring a third party advocacy case to the supreme court on behalf of the unborn children?

i think it does.

and now thanks to CJ Roberts, we have standing.

[zeugma]

Speaking of standing, The following is from Thomas' dissent. Pure gold, as always.

And today, the plurality reaffirms our precedent allowing beer vendors to assert the Fourteenth Amendment rights of their potential customers. Ante, at 14 (citing Craig v. Boren, 429 U. S. 190, 192 (1976)). But it is fair to wonder whether gun vendors could expect to receive the same privilege if they seek to vindicate the Second Amendment rights of their customers. Given this Court’s ad hoc approach to third-party standing and its tendency to treat the Second Amendment as a second-class right, their time would be better spent waiting for Godot.