Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado Supreme Court upholds 2013 large-capacity gun magazine ban as constitutional
thedenverchannel.com ^ | last updated 10:40 AM, Jun 29, 2020 | Blair Miller

Posted on 06/29/2020 11:12:08 AM PDT by real saxophonist

Colorado Supreme Court upholds 2013 large-capacity gun magazine ban as constitutional

By: Blair Miller

DENVER – The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the state’s ban on large-capacity gun magazines as constitutional in a ruling issued Monday nearly seven years after the law passed in the wake of the Aurora theater shooting.

“The legislation is a reasonable exercise of the police power that has neither the purpose nor effect of nullifying the right to bear arms in self-defense. Accordingly, the court affirms the judgment of the court of appeals,” Justice Monica M. Márquez wrote in the opinion.

Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and other gun advocates in 2016 sued over the law, which banned gun magazines that hold more than 15 rounds, in 2016, arguing that Coloradans’ constitutional right to bear arms was violated by the magazine ban contained in House Bill 13-1224, which was passed by lawmakers and signed by then-Gov. John Hickenlooper in 2013.

The law, and others related to guns in Colorado, were passed after the 2012 Aurora theater shooting, in which the shooter used a large-capacity magazine and killed 12 people.

But RMGO challenged the law under Article II, Section 13 of the Colorado Constitution rather than the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, meaning that the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling cannot be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The attorneys for the gun groups had argued that the law could be construed to “ban practically all detachable magazines,” as Márquez wrote. About half of the state’s sheriffs had filed briefs in support of overturning the ban, though law enforcement agencies are exempt from the law.

But she wrote in the court’s opinion, “We disagree. We conclude that Plaintiff’s interpretation of the definition of ‘large-capacity magazine’ is inconsistent with the provision’s plain text because it ignores the narrowing language, ‘designed to be readily converted to accept[] more than fifteen rounds of ammunition.”

“Because Plaintiffs do not challenge HB 1224 under the Second Amendment, we do not address whether the legislation runs afoul of the federal constitution. That separate question is simply not before us,” the court wrote.

A district court and the Colorado Court of Appeals both previously found that the law was constitutional, so the Supreme Court’s ruling upheld the court of appeals’ ruling.

“I’m encouraged to see the Supreme Court uphold the 2013 large capacity magazine ban,” said Rep. Tom Sullivan, D-Centennial, whose son was killed in the Aurora shooting. “Gun violence has ravaged our state and our nation, and I came to the legislature to work to put an end to it. Large capacity magazines like the 100 round drum that was used on the night my son Alex was murdered can cause devastating carnage and have absolutely no place on our streets. I’ll keep working day in and day out to fight the epidemic of gun violence.”

This is a developing story and will be updated.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: banglist; colorado; hickenlooper; johnhickenlooper; magpul; secondamendment; selfdefense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2020 11:12:08 AM PDT by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
So I can buy 1000 Glock 19 magazines if I want, but no Glock 17 magazines.

Hexmag now makes 15 round AR mags, sized like a 30 round, specifically for sale to Colorado and another state.

2 posted on 06/29/2020 11:15:46 AM PDT by real saxophonist (If you believe masks work, you also believe Santa Claus ate the Easter Bunny for dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

[[“Because Plaintiffs do not challenge HB 1224 under the Second Amendment, we do not address whether the legislation runs afoul of the federal constitution. That separate question is simply not before us,” the court wrote. ]]

Well lawyers- put it before the court then


3 posted on 06/29/2020 11:15:48 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

“....Justice Monica M. Márquez wrote in the opinion....”
Nough said, right there.


4 posted on 06/29/2020 11:16:58 AM PDT by lgjhn23 (Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

what a shame we are afflicted with such anti-American “judges” who constantly subvert the US Constitution and our individual liberties (that our fore-bearers fought so many times to establish, protect, and preserve for us)

“judges” like this should be arrested, tried, and imprisoned!


5 posted on 06/29/2020 11:17:59 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (Politicians are not born, they’re excreted. Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
https://kdvr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2020/06/CO-SupCo.pdf
6 posted on 06/29/2020 11:18:10 AM PDT by real saxophonist (If you believe masks work, you also believe Santa Claus ate the Easter Bunny for dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23
“....Justice Monica M. Márquez wrote in the opinion....” Nough said, right there.

It is worse than you think.


7 posted on 06/29/2020 11:19:38 AM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Buy some “repair kits” or some 30 rounders just have a rivet blocking the spring at 15 rounds. Rivet disappears and.....


8 posted on 06/29/2020 11:21:18 AM PDT by dynachrome (The panic will end, the tyranny will not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Fortunately, as opposed to these turds, the people don’t find it “constitutional”. Thank you California and Hickenlooper.


9 posted on 06/29/2020 11:23:07 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

“the right to bear arms in self-defense”

The Mexican Abogado clearly doesn’t understand the Second Amendment if she makes such a statement

That’s what happens when you abandon your rights to foreigners


10 posted on 06/29/2020 11:24:20 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Recent events have made clear that the bans on full auto weapons is an unconstitutional restriction which is impacting the well-regulated militia of the nation.


11 posted on 06/29/2020 11:24:38 AM PDT by cmj328 (We live here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Key sentence:


[But RMGO challenged the law under Article II, Section 13 of the Colorado Constitution rather than the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, meaning that the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling cannot be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. ]


12 posted on 06/29/2020 11:25:37 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

The stupidity here with this law is so stupid it’s an insult to stupid people. 1st, BAD people who do BAD things with firearms do not obey the law putting everyone else in grave danger (Duh!). 2nd, how did they come up with 15 round limitation ? why not 10 ? 5 ? 2 ? This legislation just reeks “liberal BS” feel good.
3rd, what are out of state people who have legal owned firearms with reciprocal conceal carry licenses supposed to do traveling through the state with magazines of a larger capacity (very common) ? 4th, what keeps bad people from having eight 15 round magazines on their person to do bad things ?


13 posted on 06/29/2020 11:26:26 AM PDT by The Sentient Sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

Wonder what her girlfriend looks like.


14 posted on 06/29/2020 11:28:11 AM PDT by allblues (God is neither a Republican nor a Democrat but Satan is definitely a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

“Hexmag now makes 15 round AR mags, sized like a 30 round,”

So it’s twice as long as it needs to be? It that just for style and appearance?


15 posted on 06/29/2020 11:28:35 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Ping


16 posted on 06/29/2020 11:31:33 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Fact: Gun control laws kill innocents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Basically, yeah. Or to fit better in mag pouches.


17 posted on 06/29/2020 11:32:54 AM PDT by real saxophonist (If you believe masks work, you also believe Santa Claus ate the Easter Bunny for dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: allblues

“...Wonder what her girlfriend looks like....”

When they look in the mirror, they hate the world....


18 posted on 06/29/2020 11:33:51 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

“....It is worse than you think.....”

Naaaa. I figured I had it about right....right from the start.
It’s a stupid rule and sooooo many ways to get around it legally.
As an above poster said: It’s just insane lib “feel good” BS.


19 posted on 06/29/2020 11:34:08 AM PDT by lgjhn23 (Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners...

...is Dudley Brown, a self-important azzhole who is the reason we don't have 30 round mags. There was a chance to compromise on that, but it wasn't "pure enough" for him because the worthless drum mags would still be banned.

20 posted on 06/29/2020 11:35:14 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson