Let me guess, a Clintdog appointee?
surprised a federal judge didn’t order all evidence against hilarity and ilk all destroyed too-
Pretty slick racket they got going there- if dems are involved, order all records destroyed, if republicans are involved demand they turn over everything ‘or else’ they will be held in contempt- arrested tried and convicted- heck, just throw out the arrest and trial- just move straight to convicted-
I hope Horowitz can get some kind of injunction. I never heard of a judge actually wanting evidence to be destroyed.
Every single document should be uploaded to the net. You can’t ban the signal.
WTF? ?DESTROY EVIDENCE? OMG! We are OVER as a country!
Leak the files to Alex Jones!
He might have visited Pedophile island
I can understand a judge, rightly or wrongly, prohibiting certain “evidence from being presented in court. But how can any judge have the authority to rule that any “evidence” be destroyed. It the material is truly “evidence” then it is of use to either the prosecutor or the defendant in a criminal matter, and to the plaintiff or the defense in a civil matter. I am 80-years old and have never encountered this kind of ruling before.
Compromised.