To: jazusamo
15 posted on
07/06/2020 7:45:14 AM PDT by
kabar
To: kabar
I have the same question. Faithless Electors (those who go against their state's "will" via the states vote) can be outlawed by the State, but what about when a state SANCTIONS faithless electors via the National Popular Vote compact some states have entered into?
23 posted on
07/06/2020 7:51:56 AM PDT by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: kabar
27 posted on
07/06/2020 7:55:08 AM PDT by
stylin19a
( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: kabar
Yes, that “little conspiracy” is floating along, (deliberately) staying below the water level of the news media observations and comments.
To: kabar
“So how does this affect the national popular vote movement”
I would think that would be a different issue for SCOTUS. In that case states are forcing electors to vote against the will of the people in favor of the national popular vote. In this case SCOTUS said forcing electors to vote with the will of the people is ok.
To: kabar
It should be determined by Congress if States can make compacts, but with the split Houses, it probably would not be determined. It is even in the Constitution, that it is up to Congress whether or not Compacts can be formed by some or all States.
54 posted on
07/06/2020 8:29:57 AM PDT by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson